David Matthews' Gambling in Space

Advertisement

Archives By Month




May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

STAFF BLOGGERS

Robin Camacho
Las Vegas Real Estate



David Matthews
Gambling in Space



David McKee
Stiffs & Georges



Jean Scott
Frugal Vegas



Recent Comments

Canceling a Gym Membership
LVHCM1 said: If you think that's bad, you've obviously never tried canceling AOL. :^)   [More]

Canceling a Gym Membership
Brian said: I actually have the opposite. I cancelled some credit cards this week after paying off the balance. ...   [More]

How to Make $120 in a Few Minutes
beachstu@yahoo.com said: Just discovered another nice perk to these...I could use them not only at the Ralphs store (where I ...   [More]

How to Make $120 in a Few Minutes
beachstu@yahoo.com said: Hey David...just purchased mine, but had to return my grocieries I had just purchased and then used...   [More]

Smoking: How Times Have Changed
145tech said: I thought the LVA and its products were supposed to be about gambling?? What does this finger-point...   [More]

Search

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog.


TAGS

current

I. Nelson Rose Speaks Out on the Candidates

Posted At : April 18, 2008 11:31 PM | Posted By : Administrator
Related Categories: Online Gambling

I. Nelson Rose is likely the foremost authority on the legal aspects of gambling legislation. He has numerous books on gambling including Blackjack and the Law, Gambling and the Law, and Internet Gaming Law. He's a Harvard Law School graduate as well as a professor at the Whittier Law School in Costa Mesa, California.

I'm on his email list and when he has new articles for release, I get an email notification. His latest article will likely be very controversial for many of those who read it. I asked his permission to publish it here, and he said that would be fine as long as I included his copyright and trademark information. If you want to visit his site for more information it's located at www.gamblingandthelaw.com.

Here's his take on the 3 remaining candidates and how he feels the choice of whom will influence our ability to gamble online in the future:

________________________

Gambling and the Law®:
Internet Gambling And The Presidential Race
For far more than 200 years, the federal government has let the states decide what their public policy toward gambling will be. Neighboring states, like Utah and Nevada, can adopt prohibition or casinos, and the federal government’s role has been to either step aside, or, if asked, to help a state enforce its laws.

That relationship changed on October 13, 2006, when Pres. George W. Bush signed the SAFE Port Act. As part of a futile presidential bid, Bill Frist (R.-TN.), then Majority Leader of the U.S. Senate, had tacked on the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act.

The impact of the UIGEA is well known. Now the question is, when will it be changed?

The answer depends in part on presidential politics.

The Republicans have little interest in liberalizing Internet gambling, especially in an election year, when they are pandering to the religious far right. Even if the Democrats could squeeze a legalization bill through Congress, Pres. Bush would veto it.

When Democrats took control of the Senate, Harry Reid, senator from Nevada, became Majority Leader. The American Gaming Association, the lobbying group for land-based casinos, wants a study that will conclude that online gaming can be conducted safely, and should be limited to operators who are already licensed. For example, land-based casinos.

Sen. Reid could make that happen, if the President is also a Democrat.

But, if John McCain wins, Republicans will take over the Senate, so nothing will change.

Insiders know that if Hillary Clinton is the nominee, Democrats will lose the Senate, even if she wins the presidency by carrying large, industrial states. Although she is admired by many, Hillary is the most hated woman in America. She is so despised, that it is hard to think of any woman who would be in second place.

As John A. Millin, chair of the Wyoming state Democratic Party put it: “It has become the dirty little secret in the Democratic Party. For reasons I don’t agree with and don’t completely understand, most voters in Wyoming seem to hate Hillary Clinton.”

It has been said that she is the only person who can unify the Republican Party. Many conservatives will sit out the election if it is Barack Obama versus McCain. But they will be energized, if they can vote against Hillary. In the process they will also vote against Democratic candidates for Congress. It will be massive numbers of Democrats who won’t vote, if the Clintons are seen as stealing the nomination from Obama, or sending him to the back of the bus as Vice President. There will then be four years of deadlock.

Assuming Obama is nominated and wins, the Democrats will keep control of Congress and there will be a change in federal law. It might come as early as 2009. More likely, it won’t be until 2010, or even later. The federal law will go back to allowing the states to decide. If a state wants to allow its residents to bet online, it can opt-in, exactly the system that exists for horseracing today.

But that change won’t happen for many years, unless Obama is elected President and the Democrats keep control of Congress.

            END

© Copyright 2008.  Professor I Nelson Rose is recognized as one of the world’s leading experts on gambling law. His latest books, INTERNET GAMING LAW and GAMING LAW: CASES AND MATERIALS, are available through his Web site, www.GAMBLINGANDTHELAW.com.

[Email Blogger]

Comments