No sooner had I -- perhaps foolishly -- posed that question than the Las Vegas Review-Journal answered it. Top dogs from both Wynn Resorts and Harrah's Entertainment had been given tours of Fontainebleau, as had sundry other potential investors.

You've got to wonder how this news is playing with two constituencies: Harrah's bondholders and Wynn employees. Both have been poor-mouthed of late, with the latter absorbing severe pay and benefit cuts for the company's sake. As for Harrah's debtors, they're probably long since resigned to taking a bath on their investment, since the timeline for repayment already stretches far into the next decade. In other words, it's not the best moment to be seen out shopping.

Also, there's the small matter of cost. F'bleau's official budget has now crept up to $3.1 billion and -- if its bankers are right -- the completion money needed is close to $1 billion. (Insert Dr. Evil inflection here.) Steve Wynn might have enough socked away to swing that. Gary Loveman, on the other hand, says his company doesn't even have enough scratch to change its letterhead to "Caesars Entertainment."

Theory: Perhaps Loveman's sugar daddies at TPG Capital and Apollo Management underwrite the completion of F'bleau, maybe more -- but as a separate entity. Harrah's is then jobbed in to run the joint. It'd mean some administrative headaches for Loveman but nothing compared to those involved with being the out-and-out owner. Personally, I'd give Wynn better odds of actually getting this Spruce Goose into the air, but it's liable to be a charity case, whoever inherits it.

There's another reason for Wynn and Harrah's to approach F'bleau as they would a live grenade: the morass of litigation that surrounds Big Bleau. The latest batch of lawsuits alleges diversion of funds. Any casino company riding to F'bleau's rescue is going to want to be well indemnified against being dragged into this nightmare. No, Turnberry West and Fontainebleau will surely have to sort this out themselves.

Out of danger: That's where MGM Mirage says it is, largely by dint of mortgaging several key properties. CEO Jim Murren, meanwhile, complains that offfers for MGM assets aren't "close to what we believe the values are worth. The multiples are low. It seems like the wrong time."

Damn that free market! S&G humbly suggests that the low multiples are a reflection of the parlous state of the industry. Seven times cash flow just ain't what it used to be. Agree about the "wrong time" thing, though. Few are buying and even fewer banks are lending, so it's a heckuva juncture to be peddling one's wares.

Ensign concubine unmasked! He two-timed his wife with her? Beauty comes in many forms, but I'm thinking "lox," not "fox." As for well-remunerated cuckold Doug Hampton, he looks big enough to clobber the Nevada senator. Instead, he wrote a whiny letter to Fox News.

Despite his primitive spelling, grammar and punctuation, Hampton parlayed his husband-of-mistress status into a high-ranking sinecure at Allegiant Air. The latter says Hampton's employment was based on "his credentials and experience" ... not his education. Still, I feel as though my B.A. in English ain't worth the sheepskin upon which it's printed.