• Home
  • Archived Blogs
    • James Grosjean (AP)
      • About James Grosjean
      • View all posts
    • Bob Dancer (Video Poker)
      • About Bob Dancer
      • View all posts
      • Video Poker Classes
    • Richard Munchkin (AP)
      • About Richard Munchkin
      • View all posts
    • Lou Antonius
      • About Dr. Lou Antonius
      • View all posts
    • Blair Rodman (Poker)
      • About Blair Rodman
      • View all posts
    • FrankB (Sports)
      • About FrankB
      • View all posts
    • Jack Andrews (Sports)
      • About Jack Andrews
      • View all posts
    • Jimmy Jazz (AP)
      • View all posts
    • Anthony Curtis
      • About Anthony Curtis
      • View all posts
    • Guest Bloggers
    • Podcast
  • The Games
    • Bingo Rooms
    • Blackjack
    • Keno Rooms
    • Poker Rooms
    • Video Poker
      • Best Video Poker
      • Bob Dancer Articles
      • Game Room
    • Sports Betting Books
  • Shop
    • Blackjack Strategy
    • Casino Comps & Promotions
    • Casino-Game Strategy Cards
    • Game Protection
    • James Grosjean Strategy Cards (ShopLVA Exclusive)
    • GWAE-Author Products
    • Las Vegas Advisor Membership + Member Rewards
    • Poker-Strategy
    • Sports Betting & Daily Fantasy
    • Tournament Play
    • Video Poker Strategy
  • Arnold Snyder’s Blackjack Forum Online
  • LVA Home
  • Home
  • Video Poker
  • How to Calculate Breakeven Points

How to Calculate Breakeven Points

May 24, 2011 Leave a Comment Written by Bob Dancer

Frank Kneeland and I are creating progressive strategies for a number of games which are now in the M casino. If you don’t know which games I’m talking about, see www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2011/0510.cfm We are giving you a list of numbers saying that you should change your strategy if the royal flush is higher than a certain number. Today’s article discusses how we came up with those numbers.

Assume you are playing dollar 9/6 Jacks or Better, five coins at a time. You are dealt A♠ T♠ J♥ 6♣ 4♦. The proper play, of course, is to hold A♠ J♥. But now let’s assume you are playing the same game with a royal of $8,000 rather than $4,000. This will increase the value of A♠ T♠ but leave the value of A♠ J♥ as it was. Is A♠ J♥ still the right play, or is maybe A♠ T♠ correct now? And if it changed, when did it happen? How can you calculate this?

The amount of the royal flush where A♠ J♥ and A♠ T♠ are exactly equal in terms of expected value is called the Breakeven Point, or BP. To my knowledge, Stanford Wong in his Professional Video Poker was the first to use this term in print, although he abbreviated the term as BEP rather than the BP I prefer. Wong’s book was on 8-5 Jacks or Better Progressive, but the theory behind BP is the same in other video poker games as well.

BP analysis is typically done in terms of COINS, but in my opinion it’s a lot more useful when done in terms of DOLLARS AND CENTS. In this I am going to use dollar denominated games. 4,000 coins is, of course, $4,000. If you play for nickels, quarters, half-dollars, $2, $5 or higher, it is a simple matter to multiply the dollar BPs by the appropriate factor.

Let’s start off with the graph. The graph shows how the value of A♠ J♥ and A♠ T♠ vary as the value of the royal flush increases. The vertical axis shows “dollar expected value” (abbreviated $EV), which is the value, in dollars and cents, of each combination when you are playing the game with five $1 coins. The horizontal axis shows the change in value of the royal flush as we increase from $4,000, denominated in hundred dollar units. The far left edge of the graph represents a royal of 4,000 and the far right edge of the graph represents a royal of 8,000.

Notice the value of A♠ J♥ remains constant at $2.37. Since the A♠ and J♥ are of different suits, they can never be part of the same royal flush. No flush or straight flush figures into the value of A♠ J♥, but the probability of high pairs, two pairs, 3-of-a-kinds, straights, full houses, and 4-of-a-kinds is considered.

The slanted line represents the value of A♠ T♠. With a royal flush of $4,000, A♠ T♠ has a $EV of $2.25. That is lower than the $2.37, so we should hold A♠ J♥ when we are playing for a royal of $4,000. At a royal of $8,000, the $EV of A♠ T♠ is $2.49. This is quite a bit above $2.37, so at this royal flush value we should play A♠ T♠.

The place where the two lines cross is the BP. That is, the value of the royal where the $EV of A♠ J♥ was equal to the $EV of A♠ T♠. The change in the royal value of this turns out to be $1,975 (for a total royal flush amount of $5,875), a figure we will soon derive.

The graph is useful to show that the value of A♠ T♠ increases while the value of A♠ J♥ holds constant and sooner or later they must be equal. But we don’t need the graph to know what the $EV will be when the two lines meet. We know the $EV will be $2.37 at that point, because the $EV of A♠ J♥ is ALWAYS $2.37. What we need is a formula to determine what the value of the royal flush will be when the $EV of A♠ T♠ is $2.37.

The formula is not very difficult. It is, simply, ΔRF = C x Δ$EV. Of course the symbols all need to be defined, so let’s do that now. Does the funny looking triangle look like Greek to you? It should. IT IS GREEK! Actually it is the capital Greek letter “delta”, which is the symbol mathematicians usually use to indicate “the change in”. So ï�„RF simply means the change in the value of the royal flush, and ï�„$EV means the change in the value of the dollar expected value.

The symbol C stands for the number of possible combinations. “Combination” is an everyday term, but it also has a precise mathematical definition. Here we mean the number of unique draws we could make from a starting position, IF ORDER DOESN’T MATTER. That is, if we draw three cards (like we are doing in this example), the draw A♣ 5♥ 3♠ is considered exactly equivalent to A♣ 3♠ 5♥, or 3♠ A♣ 5♥ or any of the three additional permutations. These are different combinations than A♥ 3♥ 5♠ or A♥ 3♦ 5♠. The possible values of C will be:

178,365 for a 4-card draw
16,215 for a 3-card draw
1,081 for a 2-card draw
47 for a 1-card draw

Regular readers of my writing are familiar with these numbers. For a 52-card game, these numbers remain constant.

The easiest way to get $EV is to use a video poker computer trainer. Using Video Poker for Winners, go to 9/6 Jacks or Better with a royal flush of 4000. Make sure you are on “max bet”, and then go to ANALYZE → SELECT SPECIFIC CARDS.

Enter the hand A♠ T♠ J♥ 6♣ 4♦ and look at the numbers. A♠ J♥ appears on the top line, and the first number you see is 2.37155. This is the $EV. A♠ T♠ appears a few lines lower, and the first number you see there is 2.24975. In the graph I rounded these numbers off to 2.37 and 2.25, but for BP analysis we want to use the extra significant digits.

Since we are drawing three cards to A♠ T♠, our formula now becomes

ΔRF = 16,215 x (2.37155 — 2.24975)
ΔRF = 16,215 x (0.12180)
ΔRF = 1975 (rounded)

This means we add $1,975 to the original $4,000 and come up with a BP of $5,975. When the royal flush is lower than $5,975, hold A♠ J♥. When it is above $5,975, hold A♠ T♠. When it’s exactly $5,975, take your pick. (For practical purposes, since it pleases most people to hit a royal flush, when the numbers are tied, I recommend trying for the royal. It has a 1-in-16,215 chance of making you very happy.)

If you don’t trust your math, go back to Video Poker for Winners and change the pay schedule of 9/6 Jacks so that 5975 is the amount of the 5-coin royal. If you do that, and enter the A♠ T♠ J♥ 6♣ 4♦ hand we’ve been talking about, you’ll see that both A♠ J♥ and A♠ T♠ have the same value, and it is $2.37155.

Let me give you another example. I urge you to work it through before I give the explanation. The only way for you to understand it is to do it.

The example hand is K♥ Q♥ J♥ J♠ 5♦. At a royal flush of $4,000 it is correct to play J♥ J♠. We want to know the value of the royal flush where you should hold K♥ Q♥ J♥. The relevant $EVs are 7.6827 for J♥ J♠ and 7.4422 for K♥ Q♥ J♥.

The reason I am changing the subject now is that I urge you to go try this one and I don’t want you to accidentally see the answer.

Calculating BPs is tedious. And there are a lot more of them than you might think. Our first example seemed easy enough, but the number would have been different if the 6♣ had been the 6♠. The $EV of A♠ J♥ wouldn’t have changed, but the $EV of A♠ T♠ would be LOWER because there are fewer flush opportunities once the 6♠ is thrown away. (An important concept in this process which isn’t obvious to some beginners is when you throw away a hand before the draw, it’s impossible for that same card to come back after the draw.)

Okay. Let’s get back to our problem. Since this will be a 2-card draw (for the K♥ Q♥ J♥), the appropriate value for C is 1,081.

F

ΔR = C x Δ$EV
= 1,081 x (7.6827 — 7.4422)
= 1,081 x (0.2405)
= 260 (rounded)
 So the BP = $4,000 + $260 = $4,260

Did you get it correct? It’s not tough, but it does take some practice to get good at it. (It’s impressive to me that back when Frank was managing the video poker team, they did all of this without computers. When computer trainers became common, it became relatively easy for players to figure this stuff out for themselves, which gave them less incentive to belong to a team where the information was presented to them.) There are some additional considerations in BP analysis that I’m saving for next time, but you now have the basics that will take you through 99+% of the hands.

Facebooktwitteryoutubeinstagram
Video Poker
New Semester of Free Video Poker Classes at Sam’s Town Beginning June 14
A Different Sort of Breakpoint Calculation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join LVAs Mailing List


Sign me up for:

GWAE Post Categories

  • Advantage Play (653)
    • Advanced Strategy (262)
    • Advice for Players (258)
    • Comps & Promos (75)
    • Game Protection (10)
  • Breaking News (8)
    • News Stories (3)
  • Casino Games (395)
    • Blackjack (31)
    • Craps (11)
    • Other Table Games (13)
    • Poker (33)
    • Slot Machines (5)
    • Video Poker (302)
  • Daily Fantasy Sports (2)
  • Gambling Glossary & Terminology (19)
  • Gambling Online (7)
  • General Thoughts/Opinion (78)
  • GWAE Podcast Episodes (643)
  • Non-Casino Games (3)
  • Reviews: Books, Movies, TV (29)
  • Sports betting (46)
  • Tournaments (2)

Recent Comments

  • coconut on What Would You Do?
  • KOAficionado on Colin Jones (S1 E9): Knockout KISS
  • A McGill on New Blackjack, Same Old Baloney
  • 바카라사이트 on The Cheating Game
  • Bajilive on “You’ve Already Hit the Royal”

Recent Posts

  • Business credit cards for profession gamblers and APs
  • Podcast – Sherriff AP episode 9
  • Spinach!
  • THE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATING YOUR RESULTS IN BLACKJACK
  • Billy’s Book
Never miss another post

GWAE Bloggers

  • About Andy Uyal
  • About Anthony Curtis
  • About Bill Ordine
  • About Blair Rodman
  • About Bob Dancer
  • About FrankB
  • About Jack Andrews
  • About James Grosjean
  • About Nicholas Colon
  • About Richard Munchkin
  • Bloggers
  • Play Desert Diamond
  • Podcast – attorney Bob Nersesian 12/8/22
  • Podcast – Mickey Crimm 3/23/2023
  • SuperBlog
“Gambling With An Edge” is a unique cyber-hub where some of most-respected minds in professional gambling collectively share their expertise, advanced-strategy tips, insights, and opinions via the GWAE “SuperBlog” and weekly GWAE radio show.
The expertise to be found here spans the full spectrum of casino games, advantage-play techniques, and legal-wagering opportunities in the U.S., with contributors including James Grosjean (AP, table games), Bob Dancer (video poker), Richard Munchkin (AP, author), Blair Rodman (poker), Frank B. (sports betting), and others.

Other LVA Blogs

Frugal Vegas with Jean Scott
LVA Travel
Stiffs & Georges with David McKee
Vegas with an Edge
Powered by LasVegasAdvisor.com copyright 1983-2018 Huntington Press | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy