Sensitivity of Blackjack True Count to Errors in Estimating Decks Remaining
by Conrad Membrino
© Blackjack Forum 1990
rc.r7 = red 7 running count
n = number of decks
tc = true count
dr = decks remaining
rc.r7 = 2*n + (tc – 2) * dr
Number of Decks = 8
Red-7 Running Counts corresponding to various True Counts for an Eight deck game
| Eight Deck Game | rc.r7 | |||||
| rc.r7 = 23456 + (7p/2) – TAp | decks played | |||||
| tc | rc.r7 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 2 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| 3 | 16 + dr | 21 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 |
| 4 | 16 + 2*dr | 26 | 24 | 22 | 20 | 18 |
Estimation of true count with the Red 7 in an Eight Deck Game:
- Estimate decks remaining
- Compare Red 7 running count with 16, 16 + dr, or 16 + 2*dr for true counts of 2, 3, or 4
- Use calculated true count with High-Low strategy indicies.
Sensitivity of True Count to Errors in Estimating Decks Remaining:
- The Closer to the Pivot Point, the less sensitive the true count is to errors in estimating the decks remaining.
- At the pivot point, ther true count is independent of the decks remaining
- Pivot Point of the Red 7: True Count = 2
- Pivot Point of High-Low: True Count = 0
- At True Counts = 2:
(a) Red 7 is closer to its pivot point (tc=2) than the High-Low is to its pivot point (tc=0)
(b) Red 7 is less sensitive to errors in estimating decks remaining when calculating true count.
(c) Red 7 gives more accurate true counts than High-Low.
Example:
A = Actual
E = Estimated
dr:a = actual dr
dr:e = estimated dr
tc:a = actual tc
tc:e = estimated tc
Eight Decks
| r7 = red 7 | hi = high-low |
| tc.r7 = 2 + (rc.r7 – 16) / dr | tc.hl = rc.hl / dr |
Eight Decks
dr:a = 4 and tc:a = 3
| Red 7 | High-Low | |||||
| estimated | error | estimated | error | |||
| dr:e | rc.r7 | tc:e | (tc:e – tc:a) | rc.hl | tc:e | (tc:e – tc:a) |
| 6 | 20 | 2.7 | -0.3 | 12 | 2.0 | -1.0 |
| 5 | 2.8 | -0.2 | 2.4 | -0.6 | ||
| 4 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | ||
| 3 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 4.0 | 1.0 | ||
| 2 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 |

Never miss another post