• Home
  • Archived Blogs
    • James Grosjean (AP)
      • About James Grosjean
      • View all posts
    • Bob Dancer (Video Poker)
      • About Bob Dancer
      • View all posts
      • Video Poker Classes
    • Richard Munchkin (AP)
      • About Richard Munchkin
      • View all posts
    • Lou Antonius
      • About Dr. Lou Antonius
      • View all posts
    • Blair Rodman (Poker)
      • About Blair Rodman
      • View all posts
    • FrankB (Sports)
      • About FrankB
      • View all posts
    • Jack Andrews (Sports)
      • About Jack Andrews
      • View all posts
    • Jimmy Jazz (AP)
      • View all posts
    • Anthony Curtis
      • About Anthony Curtis
      • View all posts
    • Guest Bloggers
    • Podcast
  • The Games
    • Bingo Rooms
    • Blackjack
    • Keno Rooms
    • Poker Rooms
    • Video Poker
      • Best Video Poker
      • Bob Dancer Articles
      • Game Room
    • Sports Betting Books
  • Shop
    • Blackjack Strategy
    • Casino Comps & Promotions
    • Casino-Game Strategy Cards
    • Game Protection
    • James Grosjean Strategy Cards (ShopLVA Exclusive)
    • GWAE-Author Products
    • Las Vegas Advisor Membership + Member Rewards
    • Poker-Strategy
    • Sports Betting & Daily Fantasy
    • Tournament Play
    • Video Poker Strategy
  • Arnold Snyder’s Blackjack Forum Online
  • LVA Home
  • Home
  • Advantage Play
  • Advanced Strategy
  • Is it Good for Me or Good for Us?

Is it Good for Me or Good for Us?

February 25, 2020 Leave a Comment Written by Bob Dancer

Not too long ago, here I wrote an article about when to hold a kicker to three aces while playing a Double Double Bonus progressive. The thumbnail conclusion was that if four aces pay 800 coins, and the aces-with-a-kicker (AWAK) progressive is at least 2285 coins, from a hand like AAA53, you should hold AAA3.

Whether you understood the article or not, assume for today that the previous sentence is true and that you and Al (whom you’ll meet shortly) both believe that and play that way.

Okay. You sit down at a dollar DDB game with progressives on both the royal and AWAK. Another player, Al, whom you know to be both worthy of your trust and a skilled player, suggests a 10% “save” on both progressives. You agree and suggest rounding to the nearest $10.

What this means is that if either of you hit the royal for, say, $6,047, then that person owes the other one $600. Similarly, with an AWAK score of $2184, $220 would exchange hands. Assuming both players are competent, trustworthy, and play at approximately the same speed, this doesn’t affect your EV and it tends to reduce the variance a bit. DDB progressives can be a heaven-or-hell financial experience and lowering the variance will keep you in the game longer, especially should either of you be playing with a modest bankroll.

Further, assume that you and Al are sitting several seats apart and cannot speak easily with each other.

As you probably guessed by now from my preamble, at some point the progressive is $2,300 and you’re dealt AAAK2. If you didn’t have the arrangement with Al, holding AAA2 would be correct. But if you hit the hand, you owe $230 to Al, which makes the hand only worth $2,070 to you, which is a number not high enough to hold the kicker. At that progressive level, it’s basically a $3 mistake to hold the kicker.

If you talk about the money going to the (you plus Al) unit, it’s clearly better to hold the kicker. If you’re looking strictly at it from your own point of view, it’s better not to do this. So, what should you do?

If you and Al regularly played progressives together with the same arrangement, this is the kind of thing — among others — that you should discuss beforehand. There are many numbers dealing with royal flushes that are affected by a 10% save. For example, with a royal at $5,400 on a 9/6 DDB game, from A♥ K♥ T♥ 3♥ K♠ it’s correct to hold A♥ K♥ T♥, but at a $4,860 royal (i.e. 10% less), it’s better to hold K♥ K♠. You can make your own arrangement, of course, but I would only want to play with somebody who took the entire progressive into consideration and was looking out for the collective team.

But, again, you haven’t had that discussion and agreement, so what should you do?

Personally, I would make the play corresponding to the progressive level “before the save.” If I take a $3 hit on EV, so be it. It will likely only happen a time or two, at most, all evening. If the AWAK isn’t hit, pretty soon it will be high enough so that it’s correct to hold the kicker whether you have the save agreement or not. If it is hit, that ends the problem. And sometimes the royal itself will be hit, which is usually the main reason I’d be playing anyway. Once the royal goes down, the play is usually over. 

If I didn’t trust Al beforehand, I wouldn’t have entered into the deal with him. Likewise, if he didn’t trust me, there would be no deal. So, I will act trustworthy! And I will make sure next time this happens to mention that part of the deal is both parties play according to the total progressive levels.

Overall, that will maximize the return for both of us. If I discover he’s taking shortcuts when we have a deal, there will be no more deals together in the future.

Facebooktwitteryoutubeinstagram
Advanced Strategy, Advantage Play
Bob Dancer, Double Double Bonus, Double Double Bonus progressive, video poker
Podcast – listener emails part 2
Podcast – Bryce Carlson

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join LVAs Mailing List


Sign me up for:

GWAE Post Categories

  • Advantage Play (653)
    • Advanced Strategy (262)
    • Advice for Players (258)
    • Comps & Promos (75)
    • Game Protection (10)
  • Breaking News (8)
    • News Stories (3)
  • Casino Games (395)
    • Blackjack (31)
    • Craps (11)
    • Other Table Games (13)
    • Poker (33)
    • Slot Machines (5)
    • Video Poker (302)
  • Daily Fantasy Sports (2)
  • Gambling Glossary & Terminology (19)
  • Gambling Online (7)
  • General Thoughts/Opinion (78)
  • GWAE Podcast Episodes (643)
  • Non-Casino Games (3)
  • Reviews: Books, Movies, TV (29)
  • Sports betting (46)
  • Tournaments (2)

Recent Comments

  • coconut on What Would You Do?
  • KOAficionado on Colin Jones (S1 E9): Knockout KISS
  • A McGill on New Blackjack, Same Old Baloney
  • 바카라사이트 on The Cheating Game
  • Bajilive on “You’ve Already Hit the Royal”

Recent Posts

  • Business credit cards for profession gamblers and APs
  • Podcast – Sherriff AP episode 9
  • Spinach!
  • THE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATING YOUR RESULTS IN BLACKJACK
  • Billy’s Book
Never miss another post

GWAE Bloggers

  • About Andy Uyal
  • About Anthony Curtis
  • About Bill Ordine
  • About Blair Rodman
  • About Bob Dancer
  • About FrankB
  • About Jack Andrews
  • About James Grosjean
  • About Nicholas Colon
  • About Richard Munchkin
  • Bloggers
  • Play Desert Diamond
  • Podcast – attorney Bob Nersesian 12/8/22
  • Podcast – Mickey Crimm 3/23/2023
  • SuperBlog
“Gambling With An Edge” is a unique cyber-hub where some of most-respected minds in professional gambling collectively share their expertise, advanced-strategy tips, insights, and opinions via the GWAE “SuperBlog” and weekly GWAE radio show.
The expertise to be found here spans the full spectrum of casino games, advantage-play techniques, and legal-wagering opportunities in the U.S., with contributors including James Grosjean (AP, table games), Bob Dancer (video poker), Richard Munchkin (AP, author), Blair Rodman (poker), Frank B. (sports betting), and others.

Other LVA Blogs

Frugal Vegas with Jean Scott
LVA Travel
Stiffs & Georges with David McKee
Vegas with an Edge
Powered by LasVegasAdvisor.com copyright 1983-2018 Huntington Press | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy