• Home
  • Archived Blogs
    • James Grosjean (AP)
      • About James Grosjean
      • View all posts
    • Bob Dancer (Video Poker)
      • About Bob Dancer
      • View all posts
      • Video Poker Classes
    • Richard Munchkin (AP)
      • About Richard Munchkin
      • View all posts
    • Lou Antonius
      • About Dr. Lou Antonius
      • View all posts
    • Blair Rodman (Poker)
      • About Blair Rodman
      • View all posts
    • FrankB (Sports)
      • About FrankB
      • View all posts
    • Jack Andrews (Sports)
      • About Jack Andrews
      • View all posts
    • Jimmy Jazz (AP)
      • View all posts
    • Anthony Curtis
      • About Anthony Curtis
      • View all posts
    • Guest Bloggers
    • Podcast
  • The Games
    • Bingo Rooms
    • Blackjack
    • Keno Rooms
    • Poker Rooms
    • Video Poker
      • Best Video Poker
      • Bob Dancer Articles
      • Game Room
    • Sports Betting Books
  • Shop
    • Blackjack Strategy
    • Casino Comps & Promotions
    • Casino-Game Strategy Cards
    • Game Protection
    • James Grosjean Strategy Cards (ShopLVA Exclusive)
    • GWAE-Author Products
    • Las Vegas Advisor Membership + Member Rewards
    • Poker-Strategy
    • Sports Betting & Daily Fantasy
    • Tournament Play
    • Video Poker Strategy
  • Arnold Snyder’s Blackjack Forum Online
  • LVA Home
  • Home
  • Video Poker
  • What’s the Background of a Quad?

What’s the Background of a Quad?

June 17, 2014 Leave a Comment Written by Bob Dancer

I recently received a letter from someone who asked if more quads started as a single pair or as three of a kind? An interesting question to examine with not as easy an answer as you might expect. And since the letter was referring to games without wild cards, I’ll limit this discussion to that as well.

Interestingly, a single pair is dealt exactly 20 times as often as trips are dealt. Not ABOUT 20 times. EXACTLY. I’m sure there is a simple explanation for this, but I have not yet discovered it. Drawing three cards, you will convert a pair into quads every 360 times (rounded). And drawing two cards, you convert trips into quads every 23.5 times. Since 360 is only a little more than 15 times as much as 23.5 and 15 is less than 20, it would seem that when the calculations are compared, quads start off as single pairs more often than they start off as trips.

But not so fast. It depends on the strategy used. For example, how do you play 5♥ 5♠ 6♠ 9♠ A♠? In most games, a 4-card flush is preferred to a low pair, so even though you are dealt a pair, and the hand is counted as being among the ones with starting pairs, you are not always going to draw to it. Or how about 4♦ 4♠ 5♥ 6♣ 7♦? In Jacks or Better, you should draw to the pair, but in Double Bonus, when straights pay 5-for-1, you should draw one card to the open-ended straight. Or how about A♥ A♣ 2♣ 4♣ 5♣? All beginners draw to the aces, but knowledgeable players in almost every game (including Double Bonus and Double Double Bonus) draw to the clubs and hope for straight flush.

I cannot think of any example where trips are dealt and wouldn’t draw to them, but there is one common example where you draw to trips when you weren’t dealt “trips!” This might sound impossible, but it’s not. In Double Bonus and other games where four aces pay a bunch, from a hand such as A♥ A♠ A♦ 4♣ 4♥, knowledgeable players toss the pair of fours and draw to the aces. The hand wasn’t originally counted as a trip, because it was counted as a full house — which is an entirely different category. So this is a case where a quad can start from “trips”, even though the hand wasn’t included in the “trip” count.

In a more volatile game, Triple Double Bonus, from A♥ A♠ A♦ 4♣ 4♥ you hold AAA4.

Many of the same games where you draw to trip aces even though you were not dealt “trips” also lead to plays where you draw to a pair of aces when you were dealt two pair. That is, if you were dealt A♥ A♣ 5♦ 5♠ 3♥, it is often correct to hold just the aces. But in other games, you should hold the two pair. (As a side note, it is almost never correct to just hold the kings from K♥ K♠ 5♦ 5♠ 3♥. It is usually MUCH better to draw to the two pair.)

So we cannot answer the question definitively as to whether quads start more often from trips or pairs unless we know what strategy you are using. Notice I said strategy, not game. The game only matters if you are playing the game correctly. For example, if you use the identical strategy on Jacks or Better, Double Bonus and Double Double Bonus, you will end up with the same hand frequencies at the end. Your score will be different in the various games because the games reward the same hands differently, but the hand frequencies will be the same.

But we can say that if you play correctly in most games without wild cards, ending quads are slightly more likely to have started from drawing three cards to a pair than from drawing two cards to trips. This is not because it’s easier to fill in a pair than trips (it’s not), but rather that you are dealt pair so much more often.

I find this interesting and something I had not known before I researched this in response to the letter.

Facebooktwitteryoutubeinstagram
Video Poker
Reader mail – Beating Roulette
Podcast – guest Jimmy Jazz on low roller strategies for comp hustling

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join LVAs Mailing List


Sign me up for:

GWAE Post Categories

  • Advantage Play (653)
    • Advanced Strategy (262)
    • Advice for Players (258)
    • Comps & Promos (75)
    • Game Protection (10)
  • Breaking News (8)
    • News Stories (3)
  • Casino Games (395)
    • Blackjack (31)
    • Craps (11)
    • Other Table Games (13)
    • Poker (33)
    • Slot Machines (5)
    • Video Poker (302)
  • Daily Fantasy Sports (2)
  • Gambling Glossary & Terminology (19)
  • Gambling Online (7)
  • General Thoughts/Opinion (78)
  • GWAE Podcast Episodes (643)
  • Non-Casino Games (3)
  • Reviews: Books, Movies, TV (29)
  • Sports betting (46)
  • Tournaments (2)

Recent Comments

  • coconut on What Would You Do?
  • KOAficionado on Colin Jones (S1 E9): Knockout KISS
  • A McGill on New Blackjack, Same Old Baloney
  • 바카라사이트 on The Cheating Game
  • Bajilive on “You’ve Already Hit the Royal”

Recent Posts

  • Business credit cards for profession gamblers and APs
  • Podcast – Sherriff AP episode 9
  • Spinach!
  • THE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATING YOUR RESULTS IN BLACKJACK
  • Billy’s Book
Never miss another post

GWAE Bloggers

  • About Andy Uyal
  • About Anthony Curtis
  • About Bill Ordine
  • About Blair Rodman
  • About Bob Dancer
  • About FrankB
  • About Jack Andrews
  • About James Grosjean
  • About Nicholas Colon
  • About Richard Munchkin
  • Bloggers
  • Play Desert Diamond
  • Podcast – attorney Bob Nersesian 12/8/22
  • Podcast – Mickey Crimm 3/23/2023
  • SuperBlog
“Gambling With An Edge” is a unique cyber-hub where some of most-respected minds in professional gambling collectively share their expertise, advanced-strategy tips, insights, and opinions via the GWAE “SuperBlog” and weekly GWAE radio show.
The expertise to be found here spans the full spectrum of casino games, advantage-play techniques, and legal-wagering opportunities in the U.S., with contributors including James Grosjean (AP, table games), Bob Dancer (video poker), Richard Munchkin (AP, author), Blair Rodman (poker), Frank B. (sports betting), and others.

Other LVA Blogs

Frugal Vegas with Jean Scott
LVA Travel
Stiffs & Georges with David McKee
Vegas with an Edge
Powered by LasVegasAdvisor.com copyright 1983-2018 Huntington Press | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy