{"id":294,"date":"2012-08-05T19:05:00","date_gmt":"2012-08-05T19:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gwae.apps-1and1.com\/the-blackjack-life-book-review"},"modified":"2016-06-30T22:02:29","modified_gmt":"2016-06-30T22:02:29","slug":"the-blackjack-life-book-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/gambling-with-an-edge\/the-blackjack-life-book-review\/","title":{"rendered":"The Blackjack Life book review"},"content":{"rendered":"

I am always eager to read new gambling books, especially books about blackjack, so I was happy to see the new release The Blackjack Life<\/a>\"\" by Nathaniel Tilton. The book chronicles the blackjack life of Nathaniel who is the epitome of the modern card counter. \u00a0<\/p>\n

These are the players that got hooked on blackjack from reading Ben Mezrich’s book, Bringing Down the House<\/a>\"\" , or seeing 21<\/a>\"\", the movie taken from Mezrich’s book. Nathaniel\u00a0gets hooked on Mezrich’s tale of the MIT blackjack team, and the follow-up book, Busting Vegas<\/a>\"\" . He decided to pony up $500 for a blackjack class led by Semyon Dukach. Semyon is the Ken Uston of the last decade, meaning that he aspires to be the world’s most famous blackjack player. At the class Nathaniel\u00a0meets D,A. his future partner. The class sinks the hook deeper, and Nathaniel\u00a0and D.A. begin their training. They meet frequently to slog their way through learning basic strategy, then to count, how to adjust for the true count, bet sizing, and on and on all with a serious commitment to excellence.<\/p>\n

I have met two kinds of card counters over my career. \u00a0I will call them Alan and Peter. When I first moved to Vegas I met Alan, a counter from Australia, who also happened to play backgammon. \u00a0At the time Alan had a medium sized blackjack team, and I, and two of my backgammon friends were playing on our own for nickles. After about a week of daily backgammon parties in a suite at the DI where we ate lots of comped room service Alan offered to bankroll the 3 of us to play blackjack for higher stakes. \u00a0But first we had to pass a test. A few days later we met for the test, and the only one who did not pass it was Alan. Alan’s feeling was – as long as you bet more money with an advantage, that was all that was important. Years later friends would joke that when a Quantas jet would land from Australia people would line up outside the plane yelling, “1 and 1 is 2,” and Alan would step out and yell, “You’re hired!”<\/p>\n

Peter was the\u00a0opposite\u00a0of Alan. \u00a0At this time Peter also had a medium sized team, and both teams would often get together to party. At one of these parties Peter was having a heated argument with one of his players, Malcolm. \u00a0Peter had been watching Malcolm play at Caesars. \u00a0They were betting a $250 unit, and Malcolm had bet $425 with a running count of 6 with 2 1\/4 decks left, and Peter was arguing that he should have bet $400. Their bankroll was over $100,000, and they were arguing over a $25 difference in a wager!<\/p>\n

I would say that Nathaniel, and D.A. definitely would fall into the “Peter” school of thought. There is nothing wrong with this, it is just a difference in personality type. \u00a0The really important thing is that you know which of these types you are. Do not team up with the opposite type. \u00a0You will drive each other nuts. An example of this would be when Peter teamed up with Ken Uston in Atlantic City. \u00a0You can read more about Alan and Peter in Gambling Wizards<\/a>\"\".<\/p>\n

Nathaniel\u00a0and D.A. appear to be a perfect fit. \u00a0They put in long hours, and a lot of effort, and became really good card counters. They used a combined set of techniques, wonging, big player call in, gorilla BP, and started winning money. \u00a0Anyone who has counted in a serious way will recognize many of the pitfalls and mistakes they run into:<\/p>\n