{"id":910301,"date":"2026-03-11T08:38:46","date_gmt":"2026-03-11T15:38:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/?p=910301"},"modified":"2026-03-11T08:38:50","modified_gmt":"2026-03-11T15:38:50","slug":"fearless-oscar-forecast-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/blog\/fearless-oscar-forecast-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Fearless Oscar Forecast"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>It&#8217;s that time again,<\/strong> dear readers. With <a href=\"https:\/\/dknetwork.draftkings.com\/2026\/01\/23\/early-2026-oscars-predictions-odds-for-major-categories-best-actor-actress-supporting-director-screenplay-picture-98th-academy-awards\/\">a lot of help<\/a> from veteran oddsmaker <strong>Johnny Avello<\/strong> of <strong>DraftKings<\/strong>, here are some thoughts on what&#8217;s going to go down on Sunday night. First off, we&#8217;re picking a mild upset, on the strength of <em>Sinners<\/em>&#8216; (+500) surprise <strong>Best Ensemble<\/strong> win at the <strong>SAG Awards<\/strong>. We think it rides that momentum, great box office and a record number of Oscar nominations to <strong>Best Picture <\/strong>status. Yes,<em> One Battle After Another <\/em>(-500) has led from wire to wire, but it&#8217;s a hard film to warm up to (although incredibly pertinent) and frontrunners have a tendency to fade in the home stretch. Our metaphorical money is on <strong>Ryan Coogler<\/strong>&#8216;s Dixie vampire opus. Besides, it&#8217;s been a few years since the <strong>Motion Picture Academy<\/strong> embraced a blockbuster. We think it&#8217;s going to happen this weekend. <strong>Should win<\/strong>: <em>Sinners<\/em>. <strong>Will win<\/strong>: <em>Sinners<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Best Actress:<\/strong> This category is <strong>Jessie Buckley<\/strong>&#8216;s to lose. The <em>Hamnet<\/em> star (-1800) carried that picture, in a  forceful breakthrough performance. Likely runner-up <strong>Rose Byrne<\/strong> (+900) might score an upset for the execrable <em>If I Had Legs I&#8217;d Kick You<\/em>. Byrne is the <strong>Diet Coke<\/strong> of acting: It looks like acting but has no flavor. Still, being shot in relentless closeup might bamboozle impressionable Academy voters. (Incidentally, Oscar host <strong>Conan O&#8217;Brien<\/strong> played Byrne&#8217;s therapist and deserves a special award for Best Performance in an Otherwise Godawful Movie.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Best Actor:<\/strong> After a couple of near-misses, <strong>Timoth\u00e9e Chalamet<\/strong> (<em>Marty Supreme<\/em>) takes this home in a -500 walk. True, the movie is a load of pants and Chalamet&#8217;s character is a total worm, but he makes it watchable. <strong>Ethan Hawke<\/strong>&#8216;s portrayal of <strong>Lorenz Hart<\/strong> in <em>Blue Moon<\/em> should get serious consideration but he&#8217;s a +2500 long shot instead. We like the <em>idea<\/em> of <strong>Leonardo di Caprio<\/strong> (+550) taking the statuette, but wish it had been for <em>Once Upon a Time &#8230; in Hollywood<\/em> instead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Best Supporting Actress: <\/strong>What is <strong>Amy Madigan<\/strong> doing at +175 for POS horror picture <em>Weapons<\/em>? She could ace out the deserving and -195<strong> Teyana Taylor<\/strong> from <em>One Battle After Another<\/em>. For everyone else, the real honor was being nominated. <strong>Should win:<\/strong> Taylor.<strong> Will win: <\/strong>Taylor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Best Supporting Actor:<\/strong> Many years back, <strong>Pauline Kael<\/strong> astutely observed that every so often there is a performance so perfectly atrocious that it is swept to an Academy Award. This year&#8217;s stinker of a nomination is <strong>Sean Penn<\/strong> (+330) for his grotesque overacting in <em>One Battle After Another<\/em>. Penn doesn&#8217;t play his character (a right-wing fanatic) but rather his negative <em>opinion<\/em> of the character, to signal to his liberal fan base that he&#8217;s not really like that. As though we labored under any such delusions. This hamming could well snag Penn his third Oscar. It would be a gross injustice to <strong>Golden Globe<\/strong> laureate <strong>Stellan Skarsg\u00e5rd<\/strong> (-120), who delivers a career performance as a self-absorbed film director in <em>Sentimental Value<\/em>. For that matter, <strong>Delroy Lindo<\/strong> (+2800) in <em>Sinners<\/em> could be argued to deserve a &#8216;legacy&#8217; award for decades of being the best thing in a movie. And watch out for the surprisingly short odds (+650) on <strong>Jacob Elordi<\/strong> as the creature in <strong>Guillermo del Toro<\/strong>&#8216;s <em>Frankenstein<\/em>. <strong>Should win:<\/strong> Skarsg\u00e5rd. <strong>Will win:<\/strong> Penn. <em>Barf!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Best Director: <\/strong>Speaking of being due, <strong>Paul Thomas Anderson<\/strong> (<em>One Battle After Another<\/em>, -1800) is long overdue. We think the Academy splits the ticket and gives PTA his Oscar. He was the odds-on favorite to win <strong>Best Original Screenplay<\/strong> a few years back (for <em>Licorice Pizza<\/em>) but lost to <strong>Kenneth Branagh<\/strong> (for <em>Belfast<\/em>). That&#8217;s the only reason we think he has to fear another snub, this time at the hands of Coogler (+800). <strong>Choe Zhao<\/strong> (<em>Hamnet<\/em>, +1400) already has an Oscar, for the somnolent <em>Nomadland<\/em>, so we think she sits this one out. <strong>Josh Safdie<\/strong>&#8216;s presence for <em>Marty Supreme<\/em> just goes to show that if you shake the camera a lot people will mistake it for Serious Filmmaking. And where is <strong>Guillermo del Toro<\/strong>, for <em>Frankenstein<\/em>&#8216;s sake? <strong>Should win:<\/strong> Anderson. <strong>Will win:<\/strong> Anderson.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Best Original Screenplay:<\/strong> This is a tightly bunched category but we think <em>Sinners <\/em>(-360) gets it as a consolation prize for not landing <strong>Best Director<\/strong>. <em>Marty Supreme<\/em> (+400) is a threat, as is <em>It Was Just an Accident <\/em>(+650). Should win: <em>Blue Moon<\/em> (+2500). Will win: <em>Sinners<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay:<\/strong> No odds are available for this or any of the remaining categories, but our gut (and we&#8217;ve got a lot of it) says <em>One Battle After Another<\/em> is PTA&#8217;s fallback position, in case of a <strong>Best Director<\/strong> or <strong>Best Picture<\/strong> upset. Then again, the Academy likes <strong>Yorgos Lanthimos<\/strong>, so don&#8217;t count the inventive <em>Bugonia<\/em> out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Best Cinematography:<\/strong> <em>One Battle After Another<\/em> made far better use of newly revived <strong>VistaVision<\/strong> than did Oscar-winning <em>The Brutalist<\/em>. So we favor it here, too, unless the Shake-O-Vision antics of <em>Marty Supreme<\/em> get <strong>Darius Khnondji<\/strong> recognition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>International Feature:<\/strong> <em>The Secret Again<\/em> (from <strong>Brazil<\/strong>) is a lumbering, sprawling, shapeless, interminable mess. It is also cleaning up at awards season, so expect it to win this category. Plus awards voters have a serious crush on lead actor\/producer <strong>Wagner Moura<\/strong> (+800 for <strong>Best Actor<\/strong>). That being said, we doubt anything in this category was better than <em>Sentimental Value<\/em>, so that&#8217;s our &#8220;Should win.&#8221; But don&#8217;t bet against Brazil on this one, mainly because the Academy will want to make a political statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Animated Feature:<\/strong> <em>KPop Demon Hunters<\/em>. Because it&#8217;s the fad of the moment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Film Editing: <\/strong>Traditionally this is a harbinger of Best Picture but we think <em>F1<\/em>, the best racing movie in 60 years, gets the nod. It certainly deserves it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Production Design:<\/strong> The Academy is a sucker for lush, period movies AND for <strong>Guillermo del Toro<\/strong>, so we think <em>Frankenstein<\/em> snares this trophy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Costume Design:<\/strong> What the actual fuck is computer-generated <em>Avatar: Fire and Ash<\/em> doing being nominated? Again, we&#8217;re going with <em>Frankenstein<\/em>, for the reasons cited above.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Animated Short:<\/strong> We loved whimsical <em>The Three Sisters<\/em> but it may be too irreverent and off-color. Besides, sentimental and eco-friendly <em>Forevergreen<\/em> pushes all the right Oscar buttons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Documentary Short:<\/strong> <em>Armed Only with a Camera<\/em> is exhibitionistic and somewhat unseemly, so we hope it doesn&#8217;t win. <em>All the Empty Rooms<\/em>, which deals with aftermath of school shootings, left a strongly positive imprint, as did <em>Perfectly a Strangeness<\/em> (starring three Chilean donkeys). However, <em>Children No More: Were and Are Gone<\/em> is a lock. Why? One word: Palestinians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There you go. We&#8217;ve led with our chin (again) and we&#8217;ll see if we&#8217;re wiping egg off it in a few days.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s that time again, dear readers. With a lot of help from veteran oddsmaker Johnny Avello of DraftKings, here are some thoughts on what&#8217;s going to go down on Sunday night. First off, we&#8217;re picking a mild upset, on the strength of Sinners&#8216; (+500) surprise Best Ensemble win at the SAG Awards. We think it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":83928,"featured_media":910309,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1728],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/images.jpg?fit=225%2C225&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/910301"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/83928"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=910301"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/910301\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":910310,"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/910301\/revisions\/910310"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/910309"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=910301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=910301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lasvegasadvisor.com\/shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=910301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}