Caesars too good for Cincy

Congratulations, Cincinnati, you’re getting a Horshoe-branded casino. Yup, the relatively low-key casino planned for the Queen City’s historic district is getting the most down-market of the company’s three brands. This despite the fact that there’s already a Horseshoe casino just downriver in Evansville, Elizabeth, Indiana.

Once again, the Caesars imprimatur is perfectly splendid for Atlantic City and Windsor, Ontario, but too good for major American cities. If CEO Gary Loveman (left) is to achieve his dream of making his casinos as ubiquitous as McDonalds (a brand with which he displays a curious obsession), keeping the Caesars brand locked in a drawer seems an odd way of going about it.

On hand to help turn a ceremonial shovelful of dirt, wearing a gold-plated hard hat, Loveman announced, “We’re going to make you proud here.” That would sound like just another in a long line of empty boasts were it not for the appointment of Harrah’s Entertainment veteran Kevin Kline. He’d participated in a successful regime change at Harrah’s New Orleans and helped steer a smooth — and indescribably lucrative — launch of the enormous Horseshoe Hammond, up in Chicagoland. (It’s not a riverboat, it’s a subcontinent.)

Also, the design of Horseshoe Cincinnati is very tasteful and its placement of restaurants on the outside of the property sends the right signals to area merchants — who justifiably fear that casinos will become black holes that suck all the business from their surroundings, as happened in Atlantic City. Some 3,800 jobs (mostly in construction) and a projected annual casino revenue of $517 million are nothing to sneeze at, either.

On the subject of Horseshoe, if Loveman gets back into the game in Philadelphia, scrutiny of the low-end casino he proposed is warranted. On the one hand, drastically downsizing the budget (to $275 million) and size of “Horseshoe Philadelphia” was wise, given the saturation of the market and the inability of Pennsylvania casinos to justify budgets in excess of a half-billion dollars. This cannot be understated. With SugarHouse struggling in the early going, there’s not much ROI left in Philly these days. However, one can’t help noticing that Loveman has conceptualized a Philly casino that would as uncompetitive as possible with nearby Harrah’s Chester Downs, to say nothing of Caesars Atlantic City and its three sister properties.

Which raises the question of what Caesars was doing in Philadelphia anyway? The whole escapade looks more and more like a cynical attempt to play “keep away” with the license, lest a serious rival obtain it, than with creating the major casino attraction that Keystone State lawmakers originally envisioned.

This entry was posted in Atlantic City, Current, Economy, Harrah's, Indiana, International, Louisiana, Marketing, Neil Bluhm, Pennsylvania, Racinos. Bookmark the permalink.