“We hit the bottom and are slowly climbing out,” contends Nevada Gaming Control Board analyst Frank Streshley, trying to put the best spin on a flat March. There were definitely some silver linings. Who’da thunk Laughlin (2.5%), Reno (5%) and hard-hit Lake Tahoe (7%) would be growth markets? Or that Mesquite casinos would outgross downtown Las Vegas?
However, the locals markets continue their downward drift, testimony to how hard the average Las Vegas has been hit by the Great Recession. If you get away from the Strip and drive around, the economic toll is staggering, I assure you. The Strip is acting as a life preserver but the good news there is concentrated in high-end play and March Madness. Higher win in baccarat (59%) and other table games (6%) was virtually negated by weak drop elsewhere. Slot revenues (+0.1% on -5% drop … hmmmmm) were flat — but even that may have been buoyed by a quirk of Nevada revenue reporting wherein last-minute February slot drop is counted toward March’s tally.
In the Las Vegas Sun story, some of whose numbers I’ve been unable to square with those reported by J.P. Morgan, great depths are plumbed to find positive metrics. But if $100 slots saw an 113% increase in play, how significant of a segment is that, really?
At least Vegas visitation and room rates continue to creep incrementally upward, so let’s call that a recovery of sorts. (If there’s a “jobless recovery,” can there be a “winless recovery”?) Unfortunately, having CityCenter plopped onto the hotel market meant backward progress (-3.5%) on occupancy. It should also be noted, just for the record, that the visitation increase for March is about a tenth of what MGM Mirage CEO Jim Murren said CityCenter would be stimulating, an underperformance that contributes to CityCenter’s growing reputation as a nonevent.
The drive-in markets of Mequite and Laughlin suffered for attendance, even as Las Vegas enjoyed a boost from California motorists. However, from a financial standpoint whatever comeback we’re seeing is being driven at the top end, whilst everyone else tightens their belts. It’s unclear if casino poobahs have resigned themselves to the realization that the go-go years of 2005-07 were but a bubble … but they’re doing the best thing possible under the circumstances: busting out a slew of bargains.
The high-value players may be economically inured against the Great Recession but the rest of us could use every incentive we can get. Which the money-grubbing “resort fee” practice more perverse than ever — but casino executives seem convinced we’ll get used to bending over for such indignities. And it appears we will.

Would the occupancy rate have been different if computed without the addition of City Center?
I’ve always wondered about the relevance of “casino win” to the overall economic health of Vegas/Nevada. Particularly in the case of “locals'” casinos, doesn’t less money won by the casinos mean more money in people’s pockets? Would it be a marker of an improved economy if the casinos were to win a jillion skillion dollars next month?
I realize, of course, that the presumed argument is that the money the casinos earn is eventually returned to the local economy. I doubt that this is really true. For one thing, these are publicly owned companies; no more than a small fraction of casinos’ shareholders even reside in Nevada.
It remains my ongoing assertion that the casino industry is (despite widespread perceptions to the contrary) extremely harmful to Nevada. It produces nothing; its existence is that of a parasite. It is actually a very hopeful sign that the casinos are collapsing like dying dinosaurs–and to extend the analogy, soon Las Vegans won’t have to clean up the giant piles of poop they leave.
Charles, I’ve tried to wrap my brain around that question without success. If I get a chance, I’ll put it to Dr. David G. Schwartz. Of course, there may be variables that aren’t showing up in the data, like similar #s of visitors booking rooms (i.e., bunking together).
On other points, according to the LVCVA, the (shallow) upward trend in Vegas visitation has been as follows: 9/09: 4.3%, 10/09: 3.7%, 11/09: 3%, 12/09: 1.5%, 1/10: 4%, 2/10: 0% (ironically, this was the month that also saw the biggest upsurge in gaming revenue) & 3/10: .7%.
So, to the extent that there was a CityCenter-related “bounce,” it seems to have been a four-six-week phenomenon.
And a postscript on resort fees: Whatever extra the casinos *think* they’re making on these is being lost elsewhere, judging by anecdotal observation. I’ve never seen so many people toting large quantities of beer, water, food — purchased off-site, needless to say — up to their rooms, whether at Imperial Palace or MGM Grand. Customers are finding ways to get back at the casinos for jobbing them.
Does anyone keep track of the raw numbers of international visitors to Las Vegas? I think that number will be increasingly important. The volcanic ash in Europe can’t have been good but it is a short-term disruption.
My friend and his wife were out in Las Vegas a couple of weeks ago and he said they had a lot of fun. They walked by City Center and decided not to go in because the casino (Aria) was located to far from the Strip. He did say City Center’s design looked really cool from the outside but they went to Bellagio instead.
Mesquite out-grossed downtown Las Vegas?!?!? Me thinks someone needs to re-check this one!
Slot play is down. A friend of mine who is a slot mechanic told me that when things started getting rough, casinos tried to make it up through a higher slot hold. When the opportunity arose that mirco-chips could be replaced or new machines added, the percentage of hold was higher. The video poker schedules were lowered.
People are not idiots. Where they used to occasionally see the double flashing lights on top of a machine signaling a jackpot a few times a day, now you can walk through an entire casino floor and not see any for hours or even days at a time.
I believe the only way for these resort fees can be addressed and eraced is either or class-action lawsuit (c’mon hungy lawyers, where are you? based on false-advertising laws, or those casinos that do not charge them (Harrahs and a few others) put in their advertising in bold lettering, WE DON’T CHARGE RESORT FEES, or something of that ilk, therefore, keeping the practice alive and in the public eye, people will start to truly take that into account when choosing where to stay.
C’mon people! If the casinos/hotel polices are to snag every dime out of you by misleading practice, what do think is going on in the casino? Wake up!
Not only is slot play down, so is the replacement cycle. The problem-gambling fund that Gov. Jim Gibbons recently raided had $1.8 million in it, raised through a per-machine fee paid for every newly installed/replaced one-armed bandit. When that fund was incepted, in 2005, it had $2.5 million on tap, so we’ve got roughly -25% slots being installed/replaced, as of last year.
Paul, I’ve thought from the get-go that Aria’s deep setback (and the pedestrian-unfriendly access) were potential disincentives to casual casino play. Now I’m hearing more and more comments like those of your friends. You’ve got to give the new Cosmopolitan management team props for extending their casino floor *closer* to the Strip: a smart move.
Some of the many reviews I read about City Center when it opened back in December said that the casino was located to far from the Strip (your review might have been one of them, I think I read around 12-15 different reviews). Good point about Cosmopolitan, I think their casino is going to be around 20-25 feet from the Strip. Also, with Cosmopolitan’s close proximity to City Center some customers might think the Cosmopolitan is part of City Center.
Many already do. 🙂