Phil Ivey won’t be edge-sorting cards anytime soon. A British judge has ruled that, whether he knew it or not, Ivey was cheating when he won $12
million at Crockfords, a Genting Group casino in London. “He gave himself an advantage which the game precludes,” ruled Judge John Mitting. By inducing the croupier to deal the punto banco cards from the shoe in a particular fashion, Ivey was “using the croupier as his innocent agent or tool.” Here’s how it went down, with Ivey gaining an edge ranging from 7% to 21%, violating the “gaming contract,” as Genting would have it.
Ivey’s attorney tried to put the onus on Crockfords: “If the casino fouls up from start to finish, that is something which is the gambler’s good fortune.” Perhaps this argument will work better in Atlantic City, where Borgata is suing to recover $10 million in baccarat winnings.
James McManus sees a double standard at work: Continue reading

















