Vegas continues to confound

A friend recently posed to me the question of how Nevada‘s casino revenues can be so anemic at a time when casino floors appear so crowded (only 100K fewer visitors in April 2009 than two years earlier). I’m coming around to the school of thought that consumers have fundamentally changed their spending habits but that casinos haven’t wised up to this.

Even with — thanks to a quirk of Silver State law — slot revenues from the end of April rolled into May’s results, the latter weren’t anything about which to crow. For the state as a whole, only three months in 2009 posted lower grosses than this May’s $847 million. The Strip’s $450 million (-6%) was middling by last year’s standards but the locals market remains anemic, despite harbingers of recovery in Downtown (flat), on the Boulder Strip (6%) and in North Las Vegas (8%). Outlying markets such as Laughlin (-5%) and Reno (-7%) continue to struggle, while Lake Tahoe — which has the second-lowest gross of any Nevada submarket — is so diminished you wonder why they even bother up there.

(Strange but true: The owners of the Siena Casino Hotel Spa, who can scarcely make payroll at their own joint, want to reopen the recently shuttered Club Cal Neva. I’m not sure which is the more delusional notion: adding more casino inventory to Lake Tahoe or entrusting the task to a company that’s barely solvent.)

Tightening the slots, as well as the belated reportage of late-April revenues, meant a rare 4% bump in Strip win for the one-armed bandits. Luck wasn’t with the casinos at their tables. There, once baccarat win was factored out, revenues fell 2%. Sports books got hammered, too. While I expect May 2010’s visitation numbers to be an improvement on last year’s, that will only widen the disconnect between what we see and what the cash register tells us.

This entry was posted in Boulder Strip, Current, Downtown, Economy, Lake Tahoe, Laughlin, North Las Vegas, Regulation, The Strip. Bookmark the permalink.