Scarcely was the ink dry on Sahara owner Sammy “The Naz” Nazarian‘s announcement of the property’s May 16 closure than rumors began to fly about his endgame for the old gal. At S&G, we’re pretty certain that “The Naz” (™ Chuck Monster) has a three-point plan for the Sahara which runs as follows …
Informed speculation has it that Nazarian’s shutdown of the property is a ploy to get the Culinary Union out and eventually reopen something there as a non-union property. It wouldn’t be a first (see Adelson, Sheldon or Tamares Group [in re Plaza]). Undoubtedly the only reason Columbia Sussex didn’t play that card in its long war of attrition to de-unionize the Tropicana Las Vegas was that ColSux was hurting so badly for cash flow it didn’t dare close the place.
Nazarian’s SBE definitely dared. That might explain why, at a time when the Trop, the downtown Plaza and even Buffalo Bill’s were redoing their hotels at rock-bottom prices made possible by Fontainebleau‘s insolvency and a Vegas-era construction meltdown, SBE napped. Operators like Alex Yemenidjian have shown that it’s possible to reinvent a property for a few hundred million … and one might think Nazarian’s two-dozen Los Angeles-area nightclubs and three hotels would be throwing off enough cash flow to perform a retheming comparable to what Onex Corp. did with the Trop. No dice.
There’s also talk along the Strip that Nazarian isn’t totally blowing smoke about a “comprehensive solution” to the Sahara and is gearing up to approach capital markets for the diñero to execute his long-promised redevelopment of the site into an SLS-branded hotel. If so, there may be a few flaws in his plan. First off, who’s going to commit to a 10-figure project in Las Vegas at a time when the fiscal jury’s still out on $3.9 billion The Cosmopolitan and looking grim for $8.5 billion CityCenter?
Also, the Sahara sits in not-so-splendid isolation (like Nazarian pal Heidi Montag‘s solitary brain cell) at the top of the Strip. All Sammy’s douchebags and all The Naz’s bottle service aren’t going to get customers up there unless Carl Icahn does a 180 and restarts F-bleau and Boyd Gaming accelerates its timetable for Echelon — preferably both simultaneously. Chances of this happening: very low. Meanwhile, the tendrils of M life will be wrapping themselves around the SB Preferred customer network, now that Nazarian is in business with MGM Resorts International. Unless he can get MGM to go into “SLSahara” with him, he’ll probably awake to learn that the Lion has eaten his lunch. (Shouldn’t that loyalty program be called BS Preferred … but again I digress.)
Lastly, SBE’s stewardship of the Sahara was foredoomed by Nazarian’s decision not to purse a gaming license. By law, that means ownership can’t drink from the juicy casino revenue stream. Any Nazarian plan, past or future, that requires making ends meet strictly off room, restaurant and entertainment revenues isn’t going to cut it. Unless and until Sammy Naz (left) puts in for that license, everything else is just talk.
Giving the devil his due, gaming experts like Andrew Zarnett and UNLV‘s Dr. David G. Schwartz point out that market forces had the Sahara in a vise and it was only a matter of time before the economy started forcing casinos out of business. Schwartz forecasts a potential domino effect that could claim Hooters (seemingly in trouble since time immemorial), ColSux’s Westin Casuarina, the nearby Tuscany and even Nazarian investor Colony Capital‘s Las Vegas Hilton. Sammy Naz’s one-two punch of ineptitude and malign neglect pushed the Sahara to the head of the closure queue, however.
Additional speculation has Boyd or Penn National Gaming making a bargain-basement pitch for the Sahara. Penn CEO Peter Carlino had the unfortunate tendency of slagging older Strip properties when he was shopping around for a Sin City foothold (eventually alighting at M Resort). He’ll have a tough time squaring a Sahara offer with his public dissing of the Riviera and Trop. However, not only Boyd but Penn — proven operators both — would be clearly preferable to a continuation of SBE’s unfunny comedy of errors.

Has someone ELSE actually TM’ed ‘The Naz’? That was a classic Lord Buckley comedy routine from the 50’s
Funny, I thought it would be a good pick-up for Boyd too.
Its a perfect “get” for HET, it would be an upgrade to their portfolio 🙂
Over on Dr. Schwartz’s website I mentioned Penn as a possible takeover target of the Sahara (at a buyout price of $150 million dollars) and Jeff in OKC mentioned Boyd as possibly buying out the Sahara. Either casino operator is a possibility but the location has to make both of them think twice. I think the Rio (which is around 3/4 miles west of the Strip) has a better location than the Sahara but Gary Loveman wants around $500 million dollars for the Rio and he has not found a buyer yet.
Another location which could possibly be redeveloped eventually is the 3 acre site at the corner of Tropicana and Dean Martin Drive which the old and closed Golden Palm Hotel and Casino resides on. Despite it’s lack of land the closed Golden Palm is less than 1/2 mile west of the Strip and about a 10 minute walk to the Excalibur. The Cosmopolitan built a beautiful casino (but very, very expensive) on 8.5 acres of land so there could be some possibilities of a development sometime at the Golden Palm location.
I have had enough union busting. If that turns out to be the ploy, then count me out. There is no way I can see that the average worker in Vegas would get a fair shot going up against management. Exploiting your workers is not a winning long term strategy IMHO.
$500 million for Green Valley Ranch makes a lot more sense than $500 million for The Rio, partly because the latter is going to require an assload of maintenance and repair $$$ from whomever takes over. Station bought a property (from the banks, more or less) that’s in prime condition.
As for the old not-so-Golden Palm, the footprint really is a problem, as is its isolation from the Strip. The owner’s exuberant sale price didn’t help either. Worst of all, its “grandfathered” casino status has been forfeited. You can read the Golden Palm saga here:
http://www.lvbusinesspress.com/articles/2007/02/26/news/iq_12649903.txt
and here:
http://www.lvbusinesspress.com/articles/2007/03/12/news/iq_13001527.txt
“The Rio is going to require an assload of maintenance and repair $$$ from whomever takes over.” Great point Mr. McKee. You showed a picture of the Rio on your blog maybe around 6-9 months ago and it definitely needed a paint job. The Rio opened around 1991 or so and judging from the outside the inside part of the property probably needs an upgrade also.
The owner of the Golden Palm definitely wanted to much money for the land in 2007 and now the price has definitely dropped around 60 to 70 percent or more.
Paul, those pictures are a few years old. The Rio looks considerably worse now, not a drop of paint having been lavished on its exterior in the last four years, minimum. The paint was also peeling from the ceiling of Cafe Martorano the last time I ate there. Once that LBO went through, I figured Loveman would let his casinos go to the dogs. At least Station’s LBO didn’t result in a bunch of shabby, trash-strewn properties.
Green Valley and the Rio are apples and oranges. Impossible to compare. Parts of the Rio, like the walk from self-parking to the casino, are Third World, alot like the Sahara. Green Valley has some true strong points like the Sports Book.