“Anyone but the Sharks” is the answer to the question, “Now that the VGK have been eliminated, who are you rooting for to win the Stanley Cup?” in Las Vegas and among virtually 100% of the VGK fan base.
But the answer to this very same question among the referees in the NHL sure seems to be, “No one but the Sharks.”
We all know how Game 7 went down when the San Jose Sharks defeated the VGK in a call that even the allegedly fouled player, Joe Pavelski, claimed a few days after the game wasn’t a major penalty.
The NHL called Bill Foley and George McPhee the following day to apologize about the grievous error that the officials made, which caused the wrong team to advance to the next round. Yes, I know that the VGK were at one point leading the series three games to one and they were leading Game 7 by a score of 3-0 with just under 11 minutes to play. But even if just a minor penalty had been called, the Sharks would not have been on a 5-minute power play for a play that happens off of almost every face-off taken in the NHL. Maybe they score one PPG, but not four.
The referees influenced the results of that game — there’s no doubt about it. They didn’t initially even call a penalty on Cody Eakin. Not until they blew the play dead and had “Old Man” Joe screaming at them for a major penalty, along with the crowd at SAP Center in San Jose, did the four officials get together to call a penalty on something that they witnessed and didn’t consider an infraction when it happened.
The day after the Game 7 call on Cody Eakin, longtime NHL referee Kerry Fraser tweeted that he “felt sick in the pit of my stomach” when the penalty was called.
I thought that after this heartbreaking loss, I’d be done writing about hockey until October when the VGK start up their 2019-2020 season.
But then I ran into Donny, a poker dealer at the Flamingo and a big-time VGK fan who follows my blog. We always talk hockey, even when he’s dealing at my table. Last night, Donny was livid about how, once again, the Sharks were the beneficiaries of a blown call by the on-ice officials. He suggested I needed to vent for all VGK fans, including himself. Well, Donny, you convinced me.
The Stanley Cup has always been noted for being the hardest major-league championship to win, a battle among 16 teams who spill blood, loose teeth, break bones, and play through injuries that would make a baseball or basketball player sit out a month for the healing process. It now takes 16 wins in games that, for the most part, are played every other night in order to hoist the trophy over the winning team’s heads and have their names forever etched on the Stanley Cup, often referred to as the most cherished trophy in all of sports.
This year seems to be a different story. Too many games aren’t being decided by the players who are dripping blood. And these particular playoffs may forever be tainted if the San Jose Sharks are, God forbid, to win the 2018-2019 Stanley Cup.
We’re always told that the hockey gods make sure things don’t go unnoticed and if they do, they make sure they’re corrected. Well, I sure hope they’re paying attention, because the sanctity of the Stanley Cup is at risk here.
Last night in a pivotal Game 3 in the Western Conference Final with the series tied at 1-1 and in overtime, the four on-ice officials again didn’t see a blatant hand pass in the Sharks offensive zone that led to the winning goal by Erik Karlsson. Unlike in the VGK-Sharks series, they didn’t get together to confer. How do four officials positioned on different areas of the ice not see this hand pass?
The play isn’t reviewable; a hand pass can be called only by one of the four officials.
The game used to be overseen by one referee and two linesmen until that was changed for the 2000-2001 season. The NHL held the opinion that the game had become too fast for just one official to be the only eyes of the game for infractions. Yes, linesmen handle offsides and icing calls and can also call a hand-pass infraction that will stop play, but the referee is the only one who can call a penalty. Linesmen can assist a referee on major penalties after the play is stopped, so the second referee was put in place 18 years ago.
I find it hard to believe that all four officials missed the hand pass that gave the Sharks the OT goal and a win that wasn’t deserved. The Sharks also received a crucial call in their second-round series vs. the Colorado Avalanche when a goal was disallowed because of an offsides when there was video evidence that the player was clearly not offsides.
To add salt to the wound last night for the St. Louis Blues, Timo Meier is officially credited with an assist. So, the league “officially” records an assist for a hand pass that “officially” didn’t happen.
Making the loss all the more painful for the Blues was that they had twice rallied from two-goal deficits and held a one-goal lead with just over a minute left in regulation. However, the Sharks’ Logan Couture tied it at 4-4 with 61 seconds left, after San Jose pulled its goalie, Martin Jones, to put an extra skater on the ice.
The league confirmed the play could not be reviewed.
“Plays of this nature are not reviewable,” the NHL said in a statement, via ESPN. “A hand pass that goes into the net can be reviewed, but a hand pass between teammates cannot be reviewed.”
FanDuel doesn’t see it that way; the sports book is refunding all moneyline bets on the Blues from Game 3.
As a long-time hockey fan, I pray that the San Jose Sharks do not win the Stanley Cup this year. If they do, it will forever be a black eye for the NHL, which for over 100 years has had the most cherished trophy that players literally bled for.
Your comments and opinions are welcome and appreciated here at LasVegasAdvisor.com (to comment, you just have to register on the site, which takes all of 30 seconds and is free, of course). You can also contact me directly at [email protected] or visit my Facebook page, Vegas Hockey Guy.

Never miss another post
This is why I’ve always believed that ALL goals in the NHL should be automatically reviewed — just as they they do with all touchdowns in the NFL.
Comment I received
A commentI received
Good take Joe. I appreciate your views but disagree on the calls. When you slow down the so called hand pass from the camera behind the goalie, where one ref was positioned, it is not evident to me he actually touched the puck with his glove. He just as easily swiped and missed it. It could have easily went off his body. It also looks as though the puck went off the defenseman shin. Go back and look again with just that in mind, not that the Sharks got a favorable call against the Knights.
Are you seriously saying the Captain for the Avalanche was on the blue line when the puck crossed into the Sharks zone? The laziness of the Captain, not the rules caused that goal to be overturned. If he hustles to the bench, they score.
I know the trend is to take out the umpires and refs from the games. I for one hope that never happens. There are so many calls that are missed in a game. What happens if the refs do not miss the delay of game against Perron. The Blues are on the penalty kill instead of going down to score. What if they did not miss the stick to the face on Braun? Maybe the Sharks score on a 4 minute double minor. It goes both ways.
Still the worst call I have ever seen was the 1985 World Series. The Cardinals had the series won but the umpire blew the call in game 6. Baseball survived and so will hockey. The Royals are not giving back their WS rings nor will the Sharks give a damn if they win the Cup.
Just my thoughts on a lazy day.
Jeff Yepsen always good to hear from you. I just wish it was at T-Mobile. Your point is noted but in my opinion from watching the video is that he made a clear and distinct motion with his arm to push the puck forward and to the front of the net. It doesn’t have to actually touch his glove for it to be a hand pass. His intentions were clear in my opinion. But as always I respect your opinion. Here is one we can agree on. Looking forward to seeing you in October at T-Mobile.
Another comment
Yup, right again. According to one analyst on NHL ch this morning, there is a rule on the books that should have made them review the goal. 🥴. He also suggested that with the type of technology we have today, one ref should be watching from an eye in the sky. Do you think there will be any rule changes before next season? Be well and Go Knights. 🤠❤️🏒
I sure hope some changes are made. We just can not have this cherished trophy tainted in any way shape or form.
Additional Input
Joe, you’re too kind and soft with your words on last night’s play. Let it rip!! Refs sucks donkey-sharks dicks!! I feel a little better now 😁
As always, I’ll still seek informative info from wise men. 🤗
Comment I received
Enjoyed reading that article on last night’s travesty of a hockey game😠 I too hope be and pray those guys (I can’t bring myself to say the team name) don’t win the cup, well, I’m not gonna elaborate.
Here’s a thought, if Boston gets in and plays them, let Marchand plant a kiss on Thornton….,😂🤣😂🤣
I love your thought
Another readers opinion
There better be rule changes. 1 controversial call maybe…but when you get to 3 something is a little fishy. It’s one thing if it’s during the regular season, but it should never happen during the playoffs.
Rachel something is “FISHY” LOL
In response to my FISHY comment
OOps 🙂 I didn’t even think of that when I put it on there. Thanks for the laugh.
A comment I received
Very good article. Thanks.
Input from a reader
Bullshit call once again. 4 refs right there. Not sure how they missed it.
Another comment
No excuse for that non call. If all 4 officials didn’t see that there must have been a topless woman sitting in the front row. I guess another gm getting an apology call.
Michael that topless women happened at T-Mobile. Only in Vegas LOL
A comment I received
Always right on the dot! Pen to paper expressing so well our disbelief about these playoffs! 👏🏻👏🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻😩😩😩
Can we shelve all the fanboy whining for just a little while? The Golden Knights LOST. Lost lost lost lost lost. Yeah, it was all the refs’ fault blah blah blah. Blowing a 3-1 series lead–that was the refs’ fault. Blowing a three-goal lead in the third period–that was the refs’ fault. Because we KNOW that there is no way that a team that loses a man to a penalty can EVER stop the other team from scoring goal after goal after goal. That’s why so many hockey games are decided by scores like 27-2. Oh, wait.
I venture to say that you might just be a wee bit biased regarding the fortunes of the Sharks and the various referee calls in the games they’re playing now. First of all, there are good and bad referee calls in any game, in every sport, and good teams expect those calls to go both ways and adjust for them if necessary. Second, following the Sharks games and attempting to delegitimize their win over the VGK by saying that there is some massive ref conspiracy to let them win is just plain STUPID. And massively pointless.
I didn’t watch every game in the series, but in the ones I did watch, there were dubious ref calls that went in BOTH directions. But I don’t see anybody whining about those calls that FAVORED the VGK. Also, I think the refs have a better view of what goes I than I do, watching my TV set. So am I an authority, sitting there on my couch and holding a can of beer? No. And neither are you.
What did the refs do to make Vegas lose game 5? How about game 6? The Knights had a 3 to 1 lead.
Major penalties are often killed off or give up one goal. Last I checked a major doesn’t come with an automatic 4 goals. Heck the Wolves (VGK farm team I have season tickets for) this playoffs had two majors in their favor and scored ZERO goals.
Good teams beat bad refs… period. Sorry the Knights lost, I know it hurts but the whining about a 1 bad call in a 7 game series is silly.