RUDY's MLB 4/26 - 5/2

Rudy. You may have answered this before, but are you monitored at an independent monitoring site? If so, where. Thanks. Enjoy reading your posts.

Thursday is a pass [B]1-1 -0.20 units yesterday 45-28 +33.38 units (2010 MLB season) ------------------------------------------- Passing for Thursday, here are a few comments: - love the Cards but not enough to lay RL at home - like Cubs but not at that price; will watch one game in this series before considering - love Roy O. (again) in this situation but got burned laying RL in similar last week due to one bad inning - love Pods with LeBlanc but how can you back a team hitting .203 against southpaws? - favor the Dodgers but how do you back a cold team at these prices? - believe Tigers win this one as they look like a focused team but cannot back Willis - Both pitchers preclude backing; yes, OVER is tempting but Rangers now missing two big sticks and CWS hitting .221 for season - Yankees should prevail but do not trust Burnett and Matusz, who will be household name someday, beat Yanks in only start against - You know we love Romero but have gotten burned a couple of times as he has faced tough opposing pitching; today it is Duchscherer - UNDER is under consideration but afraid another A's pitcher will dissapoint - Now a big believer (again) in Rays at home but do not want to lay RL at home GL today...back at 'ya tomorrow! RUDY [/B]

The injury to Brett Anderson seems to have had an effect on the A's, who aren't that good to begin with. Romero is -135 at bodog and worth a shot at that price.

rudy, I will be taking the A's under 7 1/2 today.

[QUOTE=joelshitshow;21320]The injury to Brett Anderson seems to have had an effect on the A's, who aren't that good to begin with. Romero is -135 at bodog and worth a shot at that price.[/QUOTE] [B]Joel, You know I will not pass on Romero for myself, just not posting the play. GL, RUDY[/B]

[QUOTE=tvrw34243;21321]rudy, I will be taking the A's under 7 1/2 today.[/QUOTE] [B]....and I will be the UNDER with you! GL, RUDY[/B]

I found it Rudy. Good job so far. Looks like your average Unit Play is 2 Units so about 9 1/2 Units of profit. You do pick a lot of games. 183 so far. Keep up the good work. Rudy NYC Sports 19.6 Units 100-83 54.64%

[QUOTE=BigPappa;21325]I found it Rudy. Good job so far. Looks like your average Unit Play is 2 Units so about 9 1/2 Units of profit. You do pick a lot of games. 183 so far. Keep up the good work. Rudy NYC Sports 19.6 Units 100-83 54.64%[/QUOTE] [B]BP, Thanks! I wasn't sure what the site rules were regarding mentioning a monitor. I knew you would find it on your own, so I apologize for not answering your question. Just so you know, I use two. The one you referenced has made a few mistakes. The more accurate count is 101-83 +24.80. Just a slight difference on the record but more so on the unit count. Yes, I do release many plays as I indicated yesterday but they are all not straight wagers. The record which is here on LVA and consistent on other sites, is more indicative of recommended straight plays. Monitors cannot account for anything but straight plays so I opt to post all of my plays with them. These monitors drive my partner crazy as he is a well-known 5-inning only player. They do not handle 5-innings either. I hope that explains our intentions, etc. GL always, RUDY [/B]

All of the plays on that monitoring site are straight wagers. So you have even more than that? You are the King of Action! Keep winning Rudy.

[QUOTE=BigPappa;21328]All of the plays on that monitoring site are straight wagers. So you have even more than that? You are the King of Action! Keep winning Rudy.[/QUOTE] [B]LOL...No, the plays with the monitor are [U]not[/U] all straight plays. They include plays included in parlays, etc. At the beginning of the season, we thought that was the best way to go. Now we are stuck with this type accounting of all plays. Monitoring baseball is a real bitch but some look for it and we provide. R[/B]