I'm not a big VP player, so if I'm just confused I hope you'll correct me.
But it seems to me that there something wrong with this logic of "Might as well take a shot at winning something big". If that's the strategy, then why not bet the entire $100 on one hand?
I guess I'm trying to understand why to play VP at all. When I played my $100, I think I played 8/6 JoB which is a 99.4% game. And that's only in "the long run"... assuming a royal every 40,000 hands and etc. And that you play correctly. In my VP play of maybe 20,000 hands total, I have yet to see a Royal or a Straight Flush. It took about 4 hours to lose my $100, playing dimes (50 cents a hand). I'd guess that I played around 600 hands per hour, and got 4 or 5 4-of-a-kind's. Just a slow steady losing.
It seems that the only hope you have of being a winner at VP (making any profit at all), is to play the lowest stakes possible and make sure you get your Royal Flush. But at 1:40,000 odds, it can be a long wait.
Are you saying to play dollars so that you'd play only a few hands and take your chances at a small profit, avoiding the long slow grinding loss like I experienced? Or am I just not seeing the point? Thanks.