Can we make it to 3d period with 5 goals and then get out under 7?

Can we make it to 3d period with 5 goals and then get out under 7? I don't know what the line would be in live in play not much experience there for me. But if 5 goals can be scored after 2nd period I want out of under 7. I already bet less on it and if I can keep my winner from the other day I'd be happy here. The issues discussed in the earlier thread are all here. Philly has the 3 goal lead. Crosby and Malkin and Staal are smart players they got to be going like crazy in the 3rd. At the same time Philly will turn a few of these into chances. Even if no goals a risk the empty net comes early here. Don't know Bylsma's history. Over 7.5 might be fair number here. Don't really know will update. I bet over 7.5+130 approx to reduce my exposure. I was pleasantly surprised at the price but I haven't done a lot of in game hockey betting. Over 6.5-240 was also the line. To me that is pretty low. I would figure that is at least 75%. There wasn't much movement.

Philly has done a very good job preventing a 2nd Penguins goal. And Philly has had few good chances to get the 5th but haven't. Got to figure at least not losing under 7 looks good even with an early empty net now going down 4 would probably mean that is it and wouldn't leave the net empty for a 2nd goal. Down 3 have to assume a proper strategy is take the goalie out with 5 minutes left. I think leaving that to 2 minutes is just way too late.

There's one finally bouncing right.

7 isn't just a bad number after a point playing Craps that is for sure. If it had gone over 7 I would have lost and 7 became a loser when I made the in game bet. When they disallowed that Pittsburgh goal that was big because I think 7 was the destiny there. I've seen worse goals allowed that is for sure. I thought the EN situation was better than expected. I think I saw Fleury leave with about less than 4 minutes left. I expected the move at 5 minutes but I think it is not optimal even at that point. Got to do it earlier. It is the Herm Edwards line: You play to win the game (ie. not avoid losing by 4 goals instead of 3). They really should have done if only for the PP in the middle of the period earlier and then done it again with 4 minutes left. Just as a fan observing I thought Pittsburgh didn't have much energy in the 3rd. They seemed resigned to losing. The protest over the disallowed goal also was extremely tame. From a Philly perspective after this series Giroux just has to be considered the best NHL player right now IMO. He does it all. Leadership, defense, offense, creativity. He reminds me alot of Doug Gilmour who played in the 80's and 90's and I think is a Hall of Famer.