Cantor Lines now available on SportsOptions

Cantor Lines now available on SportsOptions After more then two years of being an off-screen book, Cantor is now available on Sportsoptions. Sportsoptions provides the LVASports line feeds so I will ask them to add Cantor. That means one book has to go though. Question is, which one? Strat, Wynn, Golden Nugget?

I have a Cantor mobile account (which is terrible) so it doesn't affect me - - - Not familiar w/GN - you are Frank - - - Wynn will take 20 dime bets - - Never placed a bet at Strat (only been to the top for drinks) but have heard they shake on a nickel bet - so Strat would be my choice to delete - -

If those are the three choices, Stratosphere seems to be the obvious one, unless there is data that shows their numbers are consistently different from the other books. (There are a lot of penny bettors out there.)

OK - we have Cantor now instead of Strat.

Wish the Cantor, WillHill, and Southpoint APPS were as good as Stations..................I doubt they will be making any changes soon, even with all the bad reviews and complaints. Stations better APPS, and also better betting boards at their real venues. This city needs to step it up in so many areas when it comes to sportsbetting.

Devils advocate position: If it required -115 instead of -110 to pay for it, would you still be interested?

[QUOTE=joelshitshow;59162]Devils advocate position: If it required -115 instead of -110 to pay for it, would you still be interested?[/QUOTE] For better boards?

A better user experience, including apps and boards. What if the reason for shitty apps and boards was not gross incompetence and greed, but a lack of budget? Like I said, devil's advocate. And they may not be able to make the business case on their own for why better tools make for more money long term. It isn't why they all have the jobs they do. The LVA website could use a redesign, too. We're all good at different things. Anyway, app design is something they would farm out, and that would be expensive. They would probably only be able to "afford" it by borrowing money and paying it back with higher juice. Maybe -112 with the app (because there is no change) but still -110 at the counter. Would people pay for the convenience? Even if not, the margin is still higher for books if a -110 ticket is booked via an app instead of a writer. But I am sure they would still increase the juice as a "convenience fee."

[QUOTE=joelshitshow;59197]A better user experience, including apps and boards. What if the reason for shitty apps and boards was not gross incompetence and greed, but a lack of budget? Like I said, devil's advocate. And they may not be able to make the business case on their own for why better tools make for more money long term. It isn't why they all have the jobs they do. The LVA website could use a redesign, too. We're all good at different things. Anyway, app design is something they would farm out, and that would be expensive. They would probably only be able to "afford" it by borrowing money and paying it back with higher juice. Maybe -112 with the app (because there is no change) but still -110 at the counter. Would people pay for the convenience? Even if not, the margin is still higher for books if a -110 ticket is booked via an app instead of a writer. But I am sure they would still increase the juice as a "convenience fee."[/QUOTE] The first step many books could do is slash the payroll budget of some of these clowns running and advising these books and replacing them individuals that are 2x more competent and would work for a smaller salary. Secondly, having adequate boards would not cost that much, hell, go back to the INK boards and pay individual(s) $11.50 an hour to keep it updated.