[QUOTE=Fezzik;17828]
Better team? Maybe. All the motivation. MASSIVE home field. I personally think the Refs will be sure not to have bad calls against us, eh?
[/QUOTE]
Irrespective of the results, and with the utmost respect to Fezzik, I hear folks talk about the motivation of teams quite a bit, but I have yet to hear anyone quantify it. This bothers me a great deal.
So, even after the fact, I'll ask, how many cents is this particular MASSIVE home advantage worth? How many cents is the reffing situation worth?
If you ask decent handicappers how much the average HFA in the NFL or NBA is worth, I think everyone will give you an answer within a fraction of a point of each other. If you ask the same group of handicappers how much a particular injury is worth, the variation will be wider, but I expect that most estimates will be within 25-30% of each other. If you ask handicappers to estimate the value of situational home field or motivations, I'm guessing the results would be all over the map. This should disturb serious handicappers. It certainly disturbs me.
The bottom line is that I don't believe anyone knows how to quantify this. I've done a *lot* of work looking at home advantage in various sports, and I certainly don't know how much weight to give these situations. Consequently, I'm very leery of those folks who put a lot of weight on this in their handicapping.
I'm happy to entertain other folks' thoughts on this, but, honestly, I'm not all that interested to hear from those people who don't have a mechanism for quantifying these effects. "It stands to reason" types of arguments don't interest me, and IMHO in sport betting, they turn out to be wrong much more often than they're right.
So, anyone want to take a scientific stab at this?