Better to play Quarter VP than higher denoms?

Zapman, that is incorrect.

Case in point: Earlier this year I was playing three-play 25 cent Double Double Bonus Poker when I was dealt four Aces. On the draw I hit two kickers for line pays of $500, $500 and $200 for a total of $1,200 which generated a hand pay and W2-G love letter. But it sure beats the alternative, losing.
Quote

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
Quote

Originally posted by: zapman
Seems like one answer is to play multi-play machines which have decent pay schedules. You typically don't have to pay tax on the 0.25 lines and you can get more money in to generate comps and cash back.


I believe that is incorrect, if memory serves.
When dealt a Royal on quarter 3 play, for instance, the machine locks up and the $3000 is considered a singular taxable win, not 3 separate $1000 hits.


I once sat next to someone playing triple play 10 cent STP. She was dealt a royal no multiplier for a $1200.00 hand pay.
I was dealt KAces on FP DDB 3 play at the RR and was awarded a W-2g for $1500.
Once at the Palace Station, I was playing near a woman who was playing $5 triple play, and she was dealt a royal. She was, like, "No biggie. It was about time. I'm still not back to even." I think it's best to play at the level that provides fun and excitement, with an eye toward reasonable EV, including cash, food, rooms, bread makers, snow blowers, whatever. In my current incarnation, I would be very upset to get a $1,000 royal.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now