Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33
Despite all of that, I still prefer SP as compared to anything else. It is just a much better atmosphere and hopefully I time my trips out with one of the monthly promotions I like.
BTW Kevin, there poker room pre-6pm and post say 7pm are vastly different. Have you ever run into one of these WILD WILD 4/8 games at night where 70% of pots are capped preflop with $20 each and 5-7 players in? I ran into two on this last trip. I mean, these guys openly talk about being "gamblers" and raise with 8/5 off suit. Almost 75% of hands are won on river and you really never know where anybody is. I don't prefer that game but I do love that action. But it is easy to get stuck $200 and then the game breaks. On the other side, it is easy to get it all back and some. All and all, pretty fun but you get a lot of smack talk at the table as well.
I generally avoid limit games, because they tend to be very very very very nitty. But if this atmosphere exists as you describe it, it might be worth a look.
I've had a pretty bad month at no-limit, mostly due to suckouts. The trouble is, when Nimrod McNuts hits his gutshot on the river, it might cost you $50 or $100 in addition to losing you the pot. You get on the wrong side of that a few times in a row, suddenly you're down five buyins and your morale is shot. The nature of no-limit rewards stupid gambling. In contrast, when Nimrod hits his two-outer at limit, he only gets one or two more big bets out of you.
I had a streak of FOUR AA cracked by KK. I lost a combined $600 on those hands. At limit, I would have lost, too, but not nearly as much. And yes, I realize that I should be happy when all the money goes in preflop and I have AA. I just don't want to fade the fucking variance. That's what makes limit attractive.
So as long as a limit table isn't an infestation of local nits trying to accumulate hours, I would actually prefer that to NL. I'll check out SP for that...thanks for the tip.