Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Sorry, Ken, I cant help you. Your "class warfare" dispostion is what it is.
You are free to believe the top 10% of income earners in this country have received the short end of the stick the past 30 years and that they are the true victims of a system that punishes people for being successful. Do I have that right? Of course this is 100% contrary to the statisitics that show a massive shift of wealth in this time period from the middle class to those horribly oppressed people at the top. That gap is now at its largest size since before the Great Depression. You can conclude that is because those bottom 90% are just lazy and unmotivated to be successful - or you can conclude that they are in fact the true victims of a rigged system. Of course, when you promote a tax system that by its very definition widens the gap its hard to argue the former.
Unlike many, I don't think the Constitution is stuck in time; when you think about it there is no way it could be. But for you to bring up founding intent--you've proven over and over here to be a loose constructionist--and then run from it ... dumbfounding. What was your point? If you truly think the FFs intented a tax structure as we presently have, and a federal bureaucracy as we've allowed to explode, then you are not the student of history you purport to be. So I ask again, since you raised the notion of the FFs, please explain to all of us how the FFs would rationalize our current tax structure and the bureaucracy. And, again, since you brought it up, what should we do about that "regressive" road toll on Sally Walmart?
As for the Haitification of America: Can we have some specifics? The Fed long ago quit building America. We are now fueling that enormous furnace for entitlement programs, debt service and, in a big jump under Dubya and Obama, a voracious Defense Department. Look around, my friend, for all the feel good signs of recovery-funded projects, your Federal Government ain't doing remotely what it once did so well in building this nation with brick and mortar. Specious argument. We aren't Haiti. We won't become Haiti. We aren't the America of the '50s and '60s, either.
What did I "conclude" about anyone on the socio-economic ladder? I invite you, using my words, to tell me what I concluded about those lower on the pay schedule and those on high? Where did I note that the top end has received a bum steer? QUESTIONING how much we levy and why would seem to me to be a good plan of action in a republic such as ours, unless of course if someone holds that he/she has all the answers and all other answers are pointless. I simply asked you if you look upon income tax as a type of needed sin tax. Personally, I think everyone needs a buy in of some type, and that no one should be exempt from paying into the system. If that buy-in is $500 bucks versus $500,000, so be it. But unlike you, I don't think the top end has some endless obligation to write checks to the IRS. Now I think Perry and Cain are pandering to their very limited and core constituencies, and both plans are flawed. That does not make the converse true, that a left-style tax tax tax philosophy is fair and proper.
America's in the shit because of partisan obstinacy. The formula is busted. Neither side wins. Neither side is correct. We need fundamentally new ways of going about our business, and those new ways can only be founded through reasoned discourse and discovery. Personally, I'm still in the wide-eyed, and sometimes bewildered, discovery mode.