Kitchen Sink (Misc) - Obama Healthcare

Obama Healthcare

szelisk

Aug 3, 2011
2:24am

Isn't it funny, you can FORCE people to pay higher insurance premiums to pay for others birth control.

BUT!!!

You cannot force people who keep having kids in order to keep getting checks from the govt, to go on birth control.

Talk about Irony!!

pjstroh

Aug 3, 2011
4:20am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: szelisk
Isn't it funny, you can FORCE people to pay higher insurance premiums to pay for others birth control.

BUT!!!

You cannot force people who keep having kids in order to keep getting checks from the govt, to go on birth control.

Talk about Irony!!

I think its funny that people like you believe its a bigger burden on taxpayers to pay for birth control rather than welfare checks for unplanned pregnancies.

szelisk

Aug 3, 2011
4:54am

Block User

PJ, I know you don't believe in personal responsibility. That's why you support such agendas.

pjstroh

Aug 3, 2011
6:17am

Block User

I'm just pretty handy at math. After several hours of complex calculations I concluded that a box of condoms costs taxpayers less money than 18 years of welfare checks for an unplanned baby.

Of course, an "abstinance only" education might be even cheaper as I'm sure Sarah Palin and her 2 knocked up daughters could tell you.

agnes

Aug 3, 2011
8:26am

Block User

Correction: At this point in time, one daughter and one son of Sister Sarah have made a baby out of wed-lock. Two down, three to go.

Have you ever checked out Sarah and Todd's elopement date and Track's birth date? Sometimes, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

ken2v

Aug 3, 2011
8:47am

Block User

Hmm, government controlling who does and doesn't have babies. Sounds so post-Weimar.

Sze, you are one angry dude, aren't you?

agnes

Aug 3, 2011
9:07am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: ken2v

Sze, you are one angry dude, aren't you?

Isn't "Sze" a dudette?

szelisk

Aug 3, 2011
1:03pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: ken2v
Hmm, government controlling who does and doesn't have babies. Sounds so post-Weimar.

Sze, you are one angry dude, aren't you?

Your right a majority of the country is angry!

ken2v

Aug 3, 2011
1:16pm

Block User

And the intelligent ones are angry at D and R. You?

Anyway, your "solution" for allowable pregnancies ... I'm interested. Please explain.

alexlifeson

Aug 3, 2011
3:57pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
I'm just pretty handy at math. After several hours of complex calculations I concluded that a box of condoms costs taxpayers less money than 18 years of welfare checks for an unplanned baby.

Of course, an "abstinance only" education might be even cheaper as I'm sure Sarah Palin and her 2 knocked up daughters could tell you.

I am certainly out of the loop since I had no idea that her other daughter was pregnant. Has this been news for a while?

1 ›»

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now