Wow, talk about wandering all over the landscape on this thread. And some of the responses, on both sides, would be laughable if not so serious.
Once again I consider myself a moderate conservative. Also, for the record, I have worked terrorism and counter-terrorism issues.
First the allegation that President Obama did nothing after the latest attack I find, quite frankly, repugnant. Not only did the President immediately appear and condem the actions in no uncertain terms, and remind the nation of the sacrifices our military makes, the FBI was immediately dispatched to Germany to aide in the investigation.
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/03/02/obama-responds-to-fatal-shooting-of-two-us-airmen-in-germany
There is usually much frustration following any attack, terrorist motivated or not. The problem with modern terrorism is it tends to be transnational in nature. In the late 80s when Iran was caught during the so called "tanker wars" mining the gulf direct military action could be applied, and was, effectively.
However the shooter in Germany was a long time German resident and an ethnic Albanian from Kosovo. So, should the President order a predator strike against a mosque in Germany? Threaten Albania?
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/gunman-shouting-allah-akbar-kills-us-airmen-germany/story?id=13037467
In the case of the Times Square Bomber the bomber turned out to be a Pakistani born US citizen living in Connecticut. He was arrested, tried, and sentenced to life in prison. What should the President have done? Go after the man's wife and children still in Pakistan? Occupy Hartford?
There is a great frustration with having great power and not being able to apply it. But even more dangerous is having great power and wielding it without restraint.
I am not a big fan of the current President but his response in the shooting of the Airmen in Germany and the actions of the US towards these acts have been measured and appropriate.
What would those who are critical have done that wasnt in the German case?