Originally posted by: Mark
The banks, insurance companies and federal, state and local goverments via their taxing authorities were defrauded to start with.
Trump was loaned money; he paid it back. Nobody complained. Who was defrauded?
Originally posted by: Mark
The banks, insurance companies and federal, state and local goverments via their taxing authorities were defrauded to start with.
Trump was loaned money; he paid it back. Nobody complained. Who was defrauded?
😆 Banks lent Trump money based upon Trump's fraudulent representations. For example say they gave him grade A interest rates for his loans but the actual numbers that Trump hid through falsification warrented D grade interest rates. The banks potentially lost hundreds of millions of dollars in interest and unknowingly took on risks that may have jepordized the banks ability to pay their own obligations.
Just because the bank got their principal back doesn't make everything good.
The banks did their own due diligence & valued the loans based on their own appraisels.& loaned the money at the rate they determined. They gave the loan and got paid back. There is no victim
The hack judge valued Mar A Lago at less than $20m while there are smaller empty lots there valued at $100m
Tom you are not that dumb are you? Try lying on a loan application and then once you get caught claim it was the banks fault for not doing due diligence. You will find yourself on the express train to prison.
"I know I was driving 95 in the school zone, BUT I DIDN'T HIT ANYONE!!"
Originally posted by: tom
The banks did their own due diligence & valued the loans based on their own appraisels.& loaned the money at the rate they determined. They gave the loan and got paid back. There is no victim
The hack judge valued Mar A Lago at less than $20m while there are smaller empty lots there valued at $100m
The judge was a "hack" because he helped to convict your orange god?
Really, stupid Tom, aside from the merits of this case, why do you keep defending this asshole?
Is it because you're an asshole yourself?
Who needs a jury to hear all the facts and find verdict when we have Tom?
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Who needs a jury to hear all the facts and find verdict when we have Tom?
Read the presiding judge's remarks. He said that the lack of remorse exhibited by Diaper Don and his two larvae was "pathological." The Turd was disrespectful to the court multiple times and had to be controlled by his lawyers
How do you maximize your losses? Behave like a child in court and antagonize the judge. Then show no remorse for your criminal actions, let alone admit them.
And the Turd's worshippers think he's so smart! The stable genius has just tanked his business empire!
Originally posted by: tom
It is against several federal statutes on commerce. Also nobody can say who was actually defrauded
It's been two days with no answer from radish-boy.
tom, name one!
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
It's been two days with no answer from radish-boy.
tom, name one!
I really can't imagine what kind of sicko would constantly defend Trump. I mean, we know that Tom's a complete fucking idiot. But to be so morally stunted as to LUVVVVV a rapist, con man, traitor, and thief?
Tom's not human.
