Ambassador Yovanovitch dog and pony show

The best part was when Trump intimidated the witness via Twitter while she was testifying.  Even Fox News said it was a crime. 

Speaking the truth and stating facts is a crime? 

He wasn't speaking the truth but even if he were it is still witness intimidation/tampering. 

According to Stalker, Trump has never committed a crime; furthermore, he believes that it is impossible for him to commit one.

Trump believes this himself. He's repeatedly boasted that he can do anything he wants. Therefore, Stalker, lacking the power of independent thought, believes it too.

Stating facts is not intimidation or tampering. 

If she was intimidated by a tweet, she probably doesn't belong in the ambassador business

What was she doing looking at Twitter?  While testifying.  

If the president is intimidated by Adam Schiff (or Alec Baldwin) he doesn't belong in the president business. 

But neither of them intimidated him under oath - cause the bone-spur coward is hiding under his desk.   

I believe she was not looking at twitter - pencil neck Schiff was informed of the tweet and asked her for her reaction after he laid out his platform of describing the tweet as threatening and as intimidation. In other words, Schiff led the "witness"- typical, and, again, much to do about nothing. 

He didn't lead her. He asked what she thought of that statement and she said it was intimidating. You are testifying under oath about the President's crimes and misconduct. The President singles you out to millions of people attacking your integrity while you are testifying. I don't see how a rational person wouldn't be intimidated.

If the President wants to challenge her statements, he should appear under oath and offer his version of events.  You don't get to intimidate witnesses in Judicial proceedings giving testimony you don't like. That is an impeachable offense all by itself.