The phrase is "much ado," dumbass.
If she didn't think the tweet was intimidating, she was free to say so. Stalker doesn't know what leading a witness is--and she was a witness, not a "witness."
Edited on Nov 15, 2019 5:17pm
The phrase is "much ado," dumbass.
If she didn't think the tweet was intimidating, she was free to say so. Stalker doesn't know what leading a witness is--and she was a witness, not a "witness."
I will phrase my wording any way I like. Don't refer to me as "dumbass" again.
Originally posted by: David Miller
I will phrase my wording any way I like. Don't refer to me as "dumbass" again.
You didn't "phrase your wording." You misused a word altogether. Your borderline illiteracy betrays your lack of intellect every time you post.
I will, however, grant your request, and refer to you, rather, as "Trumper ignoramus" in the future.
No reason is required for Trump to fire Yovanovitch. Nothing impeachable here. This is the something about nothing process.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
You didn't "phrase your wording." You misused a word altogether. Your borderline illiteracy betrays your lack of intellect every time you post.
I will, however, grant your request, and refer to you, rather, as "Trumper ignoramus" in the future.
I guess Kevin is so unwoke he didn't even know that attacking anyone's use of the English language is now considered a clear sign of White Supremacy. This kind of language purity harkens back to the days of eugenics where use of language was associated with intelligence rather than experience. Take your vile hatred back to your Mom's basement, Nazi Kevin. From now on, everytime you attack someone for a spelling error or a grammer mistake, you'll be called out as Nazi Kevin, The White Supremacist.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
No reason is required for Trump to fire Yovanovitch. Nothing impeachable here. This is the something about nothing process.
That is true and Yovanovitch said as much in her testimony. That wasn't what she was there to testify about though. She was there to testify about the backchannel that Trump set up to conduct his illegal Ukraine policy. And how Rudy Giuliani following the instructions of Donald Trump conducted a slanderous smear campaign to get her out of the way because they didn't want her interfering in their criminal scheme.
Originally posted by: Charles
I guess Kevin is so unwoke he didn't even know that attacking anyone's use of the English language is now considered a clear sign of White Supremacy. This kind of language purity harkens back to the days of eugenics where use of language was associated with intelligence rather than experience. Take your vile hatred back to your Mom's basement, Nazi Kevin. From now on, everytime you attack someone for a spelling error or a grammer mistake, you'll be called out as Nazi Kevin, The White Supremacist.
Bleat away! Calling me names makes me reminisce about second grade in the yard at recess.
But you know what, Charles? Proper use of language is indeed associated with intelligence. And poor language skills, such as those exhibited by you Trumpers, indicate a lack of intelligence. Eugenics and Naziism have nothing to do with that.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
No reason is required for Trump to fire Yovanovitch. Nothing impeachable here. This is the something about nothing process.
If you had actually listened to the proceeding rather than to a fifteen-second sound bite on Fox News, you might have understood that no one said that Trump couldn't fire her. She was testifying about the reason she was fired, in order to corroborate testimony from other witnesses about the Ukraine shakedown.
