Meet Representative Maria Salazar from Florida
She stood up on stage and presented the government check to her local district from the bills she voted against. When asked about it in an interview she suddenly couldnt remember how she voted.
She's a special kind of scumbag. And she's int he right party.
Oh, and Dookie Donny is claiming credit for Joe Biden's stock market three years into Biden's term.
Journalist: You bragged about money you voted against. You voted against the CHIPS Act, right?
GOP Rep. Salazar: Listen, I need to ask my staff.
Journalist: You voted against the infrastructure bill and then bragged about the money.
Salazar: I can’t remember right now.
I was going to say "a special kind of scumbag," but then I sadly realized...no, not special, but typical.
How can anyone with a brain or a conscience vote for the Republipigs?
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
I was going to say "a special kind of scumbag," but then I sadly realized...no, not special, but typical.
How can anyone with a brain or a conscience vote for the Republipigs?
Anybody that would think a person that was found to be a rapist by a judge and jury is fit to be President isn't a good person.
Originally posted by: David Miller
You really are a brainwashed dumbass - here is what she told Anderson Cooper in an interview - a video the corrupt judge would not allow to be seen in the trial. Now argue with this video - it is found all over the internet. _https://video.newsweek.com/transcoder/480p/2895/carroll-1706196103.mp4
Since your link did not come from your favorite sources, that is:
1. A Facebook Rando
2. A source owned by Donald Trump Jr.
3. A Scientologist
I was willing to look at it. Unfortunately, you don't seem to know how to post a link this time.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
Since your link did not come from your favorite sources, that is:
1. A Facebook Rando
2. A source owned by Donald Trump Jr.
3. A Scientologist
I was willing to look at it. Unfortunately, you don't seem to know how to post a link this time.
Here it is again -- https://video.newsweek.com/transcoder/480p/2895/carroll-1706196103.mp4
Originally posted by: David Miller
Here it is again -- https://video.newsweek.com/transcoder/480p/2895/carroll-1706196103.mp4
Watched it. So it looked to me that she was arguing that rape isn't ravishment and it isn't sexy. And that was going to sway the jurors in a defamation case? How?
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
Watched it. So it looked to me that she was arguing that rape isn't ravishment and it isn't sexy. And that was going to sway the jurors in a defamation case? How?
It's pretty hard to defend a pro-rape position before a group of people who aren't RepubliQ and thus, aren't pro-rape.
Trump's lawyer was kind of an idiot, cobbling together a defense that was so crappy, it made the Turd not just lose, but get crushed into jelly. She should have painted him (correctly) as a sicko who truly thinks that the rules and laws, including those against sexual assault, don't apply to him. That makes him pathological rather than willful as such, a distinction that might have made him lose a little less bigly.
I don't blame her for trying. After all, how do you defend a proven rapist? You really can't. But a sacrosanct element of the system that Trump-hole is trying to destroy is that EVERYBODY, no matter how scumbag-y, is entitled to a vigorous defense.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
Watched it. So it looked to me that she was arguing that rape isn't ravishment and it isn't sexy. And that was going to sway the jurors in a defamation case? How?
Apparently you missed the point that she was not raped and claimed to be assaulted. No one seems to factor in that she claimed, without proof, that this happened 25+ years ago. If it did, why did she wait til now to claim that this happened? We all know why, it is a fabricated lie that the DemocRats have instigated. She lied in the first trial and President Trump called her out for lying - then the second part of the circus started.
