AND another Republican taking credit for legislation they voted against.

Originally posted by: David Miller

       Apparently you missed the point that she was not raped and claimed to be assaulted. No one seems to factor in that she claimed, without proof, that this happened 25+ years ago. If it did, why did she wait til now to claim that this happened? We all know why, it is a fabricated lie that the DemocRats have instigated. She lied in the first trial and President Trump called her out for lying - then the second part of the circus started. 


Quote her on that. You can't, right?

David defends a rapist. So honorable.

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

Quote her on that. You can't, right?


Watch the video - is that too difficult to comprehend?

Originally posted by: David Miller

Watch the video - is that too difficult to comprehend?


Apparently it is for you, because nowhere in it does she deny the rape.

 

David, either be a man and provide the quote or be a man and admit you were wrong. Yeah, I guess that is a bridge too far for you.


Originally posted by: MisterPicture

Apparently it is for you, because nowhere in it does she deny the rape.

 

David, either be a man and provide the quote or be a man and admit you were wrong. Yeah, I guess that is a bridge too far for you.


  At the beginning she does. Be a man and listen.

Carroll testified that Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room after a chance encounter one evening in the spring of 1996. The jury found that Carroll did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Trump raped her. But the jury did find him liable for sexual abuse and for defamation. The defamation count arose from a statement Trump made last year in which he called Carroll’s allegation a “hoax.” -- His lawyers, meanwhile, argued that Carroll’s testimony wasn’t credible, largely because Carroll couldn’t pinpoint certain pieces of information, including the precise date of the alleged attack. And they questioned other aspects, such as her claim that she didn’t recall seeing any other shoppers or sales attendants during the encounter at Bergdorf’s.--Trump lawyer Joe Tacopina said Trump would appeal the verdict. “They rejected the rape claim and they always claimed this was a rape case, so it’s a little perplexing. But we move forward,” Tacopina said.-- https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/09/trump-e-jean-carroll-trial-verdict-00096009

Originally posted by: David Miller

Carroll testified that Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room after a chance encounter one evening in the spring of 1996. The jury found that Carroll did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Trump raped her. But the jury did find him liable for sexual abuse and for defamation. The defamation count arose from a statement Trump made last year in which he called Carroll’s allegation a “hoax.” -- His lawyers, meanwhile, argued that Carroll’s testimony wasn’t credible, largely because Carroll couldn’t pinpoint certain pieces of information, including the precise date of the alleged attack. And they questioned other aspects, such as her claim that she didn’t recall seeing any other shoppers or sales attendants during the encounter at Bergdorf’s.--Trump lawyer Joe Tacopina said Trump would appeal the verdict. “They rejected the rape claim and they always claimed this was a rape case, so it’s a little perplexing. But we move forward,” Tacopina said.-- https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/09/trump-e-jean-carroll-trial-verdict-00096009


This was a civil defamation trial, not a criminal rape trial. It's irrelevant at this point whether Trump raped her or "merely" sexually abused her. He was found civilly liable for his acts of defamation.

 

Now, Davey dear, you know and I know that he almost certainly raped her. But are you really trying to defend him by saying it was "only sexual assault"? How would that be any less of an offense?

Originally posted by: David Miller

  At the beginning she does. Be a man and listen.


Hey, STOOOOPID, what she said was that the rape wasn't sexual, not that it wasn't rape. Most rape is in fact primarily an act of violence rather than a sexual act.

 

Why do you lie? You knew fucking well what she actually said in that video.

 

And don't try to defend yourself by insulting us. You worthless Trump-licking, rape-loving fuckface.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Hey, STOOOOPID, what she said was that the rape wasn't sexual, not that it wasn't rape. Most rape is in fact primarily an act of violence rather than a sexual act.

 

Why do you lie? You knew fucking well what she actually said in that video.

 

And don't try to defend yourself by insulting us. You worthless Trump-licking, rape-loving fuckface.


    She said she was not thrown down - her first words. Then she described her interpretation as to what rape was. At the trial she could not remenber the date of the event and she could not remember anyone who was there when this fiction happened. 

Originally posted by: David Miller

    She said she was not thrown down - her first words. Then she described her interpretation as to what rape was. At the trial she could not remenber the date of the event and she could not remember anyone who was there when this fiction happened. 


Defending a rapist. How noble of you.

 

How many women have you raped, David? Did you say afterward that it was consensual? C'mon, 'fess up!

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now