As Expected - the Corrupt Never Fail to Cheat

 I am not surprised that behind closed doors the corrupt DemocRAT vote counters have seen to it that Spencer Pratt has fallen out of the top 2 spots in the California primary election.

You claim to know the number of ballots that were cast and for which candidates?

Idiot! End of thread.

 I suspect that you and others think I'm always taking David's side.  That isn't necessarily so.  But this, Kevin, was a perfect opportunity for you to just let a post of his go unanswered, as you always say you intend to do.   

I don't agree or disagree with what David posted, as I have no knowledge of the issues, no dog in the fight.  Just that David stated his belief, "I am not surprised" that such and so happened.  He didn't ask your opinion nor anyone's.  You just wanted the opportunity to encourage others to pile on because you dislike him so. 

Candy

Innate advocate of the underdog.

I am not a fan of the top 2 primary system. We have it in Washington as well. I thought it sounded good when they first started it but have since changed my mind. 

Yeah, not a big fan of it either, here in Cali. 

What David said was equivalent to "I am not surprised that there are purple giraffes on the moon." In other words, his statement is based on a false premise, and whether he is "surprised" or not about something that never happened in the first place means nothing.

Everyone is disgusted by the tiresome MAGA bleat, "If we lose, it must have been rigged." And he's taken it to new heights, claiming that Californians didn't vote for Democrats--it was all fake nooze.

If he doesn't want negative reactions/interactions, he shouldn't deliberately start arguments. Surely, Candy, you comprehend that that is the sole objective of his posts, and possibly his entire existence?

I don't see anything inherently wrong with it. It gives the voters more choices come Election Day, which can only be a good thing, right?

I'm kind of surprised at its adoption in blue states, though, because the only way a Republican could win there is if two Democratic candidates split the vote. MAGA red states have no such problems: they breathlessly await their orange master's endorsement, then the other, disfavored candidate is hustled off the stage (and ICE agents are sent to burn down his house).

It actually provides fewer choices on election day(during the general) instead of having several choices there are only two. 

Aren't there usually only two choices? The Democrat or the Republican candidate? If a party had two people running, that could be three or four choices.