Biden, Trump and classified documents

So, David Miller said, "Apparently you base your value on who said something vs. the meaning of what is said."  No, that's not quite it.  I base my value on the objective evidence but also on the credibility of the source.  The Urban Dictionary is mostly a list of slang terms, many of them sexual in nature and particularly filthy.  I'm not sure where this "TDS" crap started, I think Trump himself may have first talked about it.  You can't just make up a psychiatric illness to label people who disagree with you.  Again, look up "sluggish schizophrenia" from the Stalin era, you'll see what can happen with things like this.  Kevin is right, learning from history is key.  And if you know history, everything that's happening will look very, very familiar.

David refuses to address this from the Special Prosecutor. I wonder why.

"Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would present serious aggravating facts. 

Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with the investigation."