Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
What economic numbers are "bullshit" from the article?
Anyone can print numbers - this is from NBC, a liberal media source that leans far left - How about posting numbers from a reliable govenment agency?
Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
What economic numbers are "bullshit" from the article?
Anyone can print numbers - this is from NBC, a liberal media source that leans far left - How about posting numbers from a reliable govenment agency?
Originally posted by: David Miller
Anyone can print numbers - this is from NBC, a liberal media source that leans far left - How about posting numbers from a reliable govenment agency?
The article cites government numbers. I've noticed when you don't like something you keep demanding more information, that you then ignore it, and then you demand more. It's funny that no one will play your little game with you, anymore.
I would post something from your favorite source, Facebook, but I'm never on it anymore, I think old people with nothing to do are the only Facebook users left.
Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
The article cites government numbers. I've noticed when you don't like something you keep demanding more information, that you then ignore it, and then you demand more. It's funny that no one will play your little game with you, anymore.
I would post something from your favorite source, Facebook, but I'm never on it anymore, I think old people with nothing to do are the only Facebook users left.
Articles can "cite" whatever they want - where are the sources for the "facts" they cite? Saying that when I demand more information and if given, I ignore it is just another lie and bullshit. I am not playing games - you are with your asinine unverifiable postings. I post from Facebook information that was posted to Facebook from reliable sources and not generated by Facebook. Assholes who lie incessantly, like yourself, never post the truth.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
You pulled that number out of your ass.
I posted a link several times while posting on this site that you refuse to read. Even though the data comes from The Fed, you claimed it's bull shit data...without even bothing to open the link.
You choose to be ignorant, and you're effectively executing your plan.
40% of the jobs are either directly government jobs or are paid for thru govt money such as teachers and social services
With almost a $2T deficit this is not a recipe for success.
Originally posted by: tom
40% of the jobs are either directly government jobs or are paid for thru govt money such as teachers and social services
With almost a $2T deficit this is not a recipe for success.
Typical comment from the right. Less than 5% of the budget goes towards labor costs.
And according to Republicans thats the big problem with the deficit.
Tom, what are you going to say when Republicans blow up a hole in the budget 10 times that size with their next round of tax cuts?
Originally posted by: David Miller
Articles can "cite" whatever they want - where are the sources for the "facts" they cite? Saying that when I demand more information and if given, I ignore it is just another lie and bullshit. I am not playing games - you are with your asinine unverifiable postings. I post from Facebook information that was posted to Facebook from reliable sources and not generated by Facebook. Assholes who lie incessantly, like yourself, never post the truth.
The numbers come from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
The numbers come from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
"What is the Bureau of Economic Analysis?BEA is an independent, principal federal statistical agency that promotes a better understanding of the U.S. economy by providing timely, relevant, and accurate economic accounts data in an objective and cost-effective manner.""The BEA is a government agency specifically part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, responsible for producing key economic statistics like the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and providing insights into the overall health of the American economy; making it a principal federal statistical agency. "Dictionary.com"Cite: to quote (a passage, book, author, etc.), especially as an authority."I never lie, you refused to understand because of your deeply held bias that makes it impossible to have an intelligent conversation.I will lay down one of your stupid challenges, find any post where I lied, if you don't you're a liar.
The one factor you and the article failed to mention was the growth of the economy under President Trump PRE COVID - after covid hit, the economy went into the tank and the cumulative numbers generated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis factored in the horrible state of the economy during covid - this skewed the numners to give the findings that the Bureau reported. Of course, you conveniently "forgot" this, didn't you?
Originally posted by: David Miller
The one factor you and the article failed to mention was the growth of the economy under President Trump PRE COVID - after covid hit, the economy went into the tank and the cumulative numbers generated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis factored in the horrible state of the economy during covid - this skewed the numners to give the findings that the Bureau reported. Of course, you conveniently "forgot" this, didn't you?
Neither I nor NBS "conveniently "forgot" this", but you have proven you are trying to discredit an article you didn't even read. Your bias is so strong that your only reaction is to "prove" MAGA is always right without even knowing the facts. Try reading the article, I know it might take a while for you to get through it, but I'll be here next week.
Hint: The article covers Obama's second term and Trump's term before Covid hit.
I'll also be here if you can find a post that I lied in, if you don't you're the liar.
Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
Neither I nor NBS "conveniently "forgot" this", but you have proven you are trying to discredit an article you didn't even read. Your bias is so strong that your only reaction is to "prove" MAGA is always right without even knowing the facts. Try reading the article, I know it might take a while for you to get through it, but I'll be here next week.
Hint: The article covers Obama's second term and Trump's term before Covid hit.
I'll also be here if you can find a post that I lied in, if you don't you're the liar.
You've expressed opinions that David didn't like; you cited facts that David didn't want to hear; both actions make you a "liar" in his book.
Note, by the way, how he credits Trump for the Obama economy he inherited (the economy "under" Trump), and he's certain to credit Trump for the Biden economy--unless it's some negative aspect of it, in which case he'll blame Biden.
David's a lying idiot, and his only defense when you refute and school him is to call you a liar (and claim that you're "destroying America"). Expect much more of that if you continue to try to engage in a rational discussion with him. He's literally incapable of doing that--all he can do is fling shit at you.
