Bill Taylor Implicated Trump In Today's Testimony

Evidence was outlined today in Bill Taylor's testimony that Trump withheld aid until Ukraine agreed to investigate the Bidens. Not only did he withhold aid conditioned upon such said investigation he also wanted Ukraine's President to issue an on-camera statement saying he was opening investigations into the Bidens. 


Taylor is the acting ambassador to Ukraine that Trump put in place when he fired Marie Yovanovitch upon Rudy Giuliani telling Trump she wasn't willing to play ball in their illegal scheme.

 

1.  The senior U.S. diplomat in Ukraine told lawmakers Tuesday that President Trump made the release of military aid contingent on public declarations from Ukraine that it would investigate the Bidens and the 2016 election, contradicting Trump’s denial that he used the money as leverage for political gain.

 

2.  In a 15-page opening statement, obtained by The Washington Post, Taylor stood by his characterization that it was “crazy” to make the assistance contingent on investigations he found troubling.

 

3.  He described how officials from the Pentagon, State Department, CIA and former National Security Adviser John Bolton tried unsuccessfully to get a meeting with Trump to release the aid. He testified that Ukrainian officials were blindsided by the White House’s decision to release a rough transcript of Trump’s July 25 call with President Volodymyr Zelensky with “virtually no notice of the release and they were livid.”

 

4. Taylor walked lawmakers through a series of conversations he had with other U.S. diplomats who were trying to obtain what one had called the “deliverable” of Ukrainian help investigating Trump’s political rivals.

 

5. “In August and September of this year, I became increasingly concerned that our relationship with Ukraine was being fundamentally undermined by an irregular informal channel of U.S. policy-making and by the withholding of vital security assistance for domestic political reasons,” Taylor said.

 

6.  Taylor testified that Trump told Sondland himself in a September 7 phone call that Zelensky must “go to a microphone and say he is opening investigations of Biden and 2016 election interference, and that President Zelensky should want to do this himself.”

 

7. Amb. Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelensky was dependent on a public announcement of investigations — in fact, Amb. Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance,’” Taylor told House investigators.  He said that President Trump wanted President Zelensky ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.’”

 

8.  An official working on the impeachment inquiry said Tuesday that Taylor is testifying under subpoena after the State Department attempted to block his appearance.

 

Source

More selective leaks from the Democrat's Secret Star Chamber. 

Two things are certain when someone discloses information about Trump's crimes:

 

1. Trumpers will deny the reality of the information.

2. Trumpers will attack and insult the person or entity that provides the information.

 

Charles is hilarious, though. If all this inquiry was "secret," we wouldn't know about it, would we? Moron Trumper wingnuts!

 

If the inquiry was the "witch hunt" that the wicked witch Trump says it is, it wouldn't be nearly as protracted, detailed, thorough, and transparent as it actually is. Trumpers will bitch about it regardless.

Originally posted by: Charles

More selective leaks from the Democrat's Secret Star Chamber. 


Amazing! The argument is ok Trump did it, but the process is unfair.


Originally posted by: Mark

Amazing! The argument is ok Trump did it, but the process is unfair.


There you go again.  I said "More selective leaks from the Star Chamber'.  I never said 'Trump did it'.  How do you know what was leaked was actually what happened?  Who is the source?  Where is the transcript?  It's just made up shit that you bought hook, line and sinker...again.  Like Russia Collusion.  And Trump will tank the economy.  And Avenati will bring down the President.  I think you've repeated all those lies too...and many more.

 

But now that you mention it, the process is not only unfair, it's unamerican.  A political lynching.  When you have a secret inquisition without rules and due process lead by a man who fabricated Trumps conversation with the Ukrainian President and read it into the congressional record, what do you expect the lying democrats are going to illegally leak?  More bullshit. 

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Two things are certain when someone discloses information about Trump's crimes:

 

1. Trumpers will deny the reality of the information.

2. Trumpers will attack and insult the person or entity that provides the information.

 

Charles is hilarious, though. If all this inquiry was "secret," we wouldn't know about it, would we? Moron Trumper wingnuts!

 

If the inquiry was the "witch hunt" that the wicked witch Trump says it is, it wouldn't be nearly as protracted, detailed, thorough, and transparent as it actually is. Trumpers will bitch about it regardless.


 

Transparent?  Where are the transcripts?  Why do all your 'facts' come from illegal leaks?  Why can't Republicans call witnesses?  Why isn't it televised?  Why can't President Trump's Lawyers attend?  Why can't other members of congress attend? Transparent?  I do not think that means what you think it means.  Democracy Dies in Darkness.

Edited on Oct 23, 2019 5:47am

And make no mistake.  If Republicans were running an impeachment inquiry exactly like this against a Democrat president, Mark and Kevin would be the first ones to object.  In fact they'd be calling it a Volksgerichtshof and go all drama queen on us calling it the end of America. 

 

Now I'm not such a drama queen as those two, but it's clear that this impeachment hearing is not designed to find the truth or to be transparent.  If it was, Republicans could call witnesses.  The President's lawyers could question witnesses.  There would be transcripts.  It would be televised.  You all know that's true.  Only democrats won't admit it.  Because their hate for President Trump far exceeds their ethics.

Edited on Oct 23, 2019 6:34am

Taylor's full opening statement is 100% public (not leaked by Deepthroat ... or Deep State....or whatever Sean Hannity copnspiracty Charles wishes to subscribe to).    SoI think you're going to have to backpeddle a little faster.

 

You can read Taylor'sfull opening statement here.

 

And he makes the context of Trump's Ukraine scummery 100% clear.   The president was using national security interests as leverage for his own political gain.      

 

One can argue thats not simply illegal....its helping the enemy of the UNited States, Russia.   In other words, thats treason.

Edited on Oct 23, 2019 8:01am

Of course Republicans claim his testomony was thoroughly discredited during questioning.  But we can't see or read any of that testimony now can we?  Of course PJ will only believe the snippets his party masters feed him from the Kangaroo court.  But that's PJ's new America.  No due process.  Just a political lynching. But that's OK.  Because.  Hate Trump. 

 

Does PJ object to not allowing Republicans to call witnesses?  Does PJ object to Trump's Lawyers being unable to question witnesses...or even be present?  Does PJ object to hiding the testimony from the American People?  Let's put it on TV and let the people decide!  I'm sure PJ objects to that too, because he doesn't trust the American People.  Hey.  Here's a novel concept.  Maybe the House should actually vote on the impeachment inquiry.  I'm sure PJ objects to that too.

Edited on Oct 23, 2019 8:22am

Charles doesn't understand something basic. This isn't a trial...yet. There are no criminal accusations...yet. The closest analogy would be the convening of a grand jury to decide whether to indict---a process where there is no defendant...yet. "The rights of the accused" don't come into play...yet, because no one is being formally accused of anything...yet.

 

Charles' hysterical whining is precisely what I predicted. As is his characterization of the inquiry as illegal, immoral, unconstitutional, fattening, etc. The opinions he's expressing aren't his own--they've been forced into his skull by Fox News.

 

Why would Charles defend a traitor? Is is because he's a traitor himself? He secretly wishes he lived in Russia (like those idiots with the t-shirts at Trump's hate rally)? That's the only reason I can think of for his undying support for Treasonous Trump.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now