Bill Taylor Implicated Trump In Today's Testimony

Oh I understand it alright.  This is not a grand jury.  It is allegedly an impeachment inquiry.  All previous impeachment inquiries have allowed for the due process items I suggest as fair..  From public testimony to the opposition being allowed to subpoena witnesses to representation for the accused to transcrpts...you know...basic fairness.

This is not a search for truth it is a Kangaroo court.  And Kevin would be a liar if he didn't admit that if Republicans ran an impeachment inquiry against a democrat president like it's being done today, he'd have his panties so far in a wad it would cut off blood flow to his vagina. 

Enlighten yourselves, people.

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45769.pdf

The impeachment proceedings against both Presidents Nixon and Clinton began with a vote by the full House of Representatives directing the judiciary committee “to investigate fully and completely whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach” the president in question.  That included rules that allowed for due process. 

The democrats are calling what is going on today 'an impeachment inquiry'.  It is a one sided show trial with democrats regularly leaking selected testimony to make Trump look bad.  That's just wrong.  I'm sorry you can't see that.  If the democrats really want the truth they should vote on the inquiry and establish rules that allow for some fairness.  But they don't have the balls and they aren't interested in the truth.  Just Hate Trump.

So you're not taking issue with any of the content revealed by people in the room with Trump when he engaged in treasonous activity.    Instead, you're pissed Democrats are following the same House rules that Republicans used when investigating Hillary's emails.   But now its a kangaroo court in your view.

Don't feel bad - thats what the entire Republican caucus is doing too.   

Hey, if that helps you sleep better then  so be it!

Is this an impeachment inquiry or not?  Pelosi claimed it was.  PJ would also have had his panties in a wad if the republicans had set up the identical secret star chamber to facilitate impeachment of  President Obama.  You know you would if you were really honest.  But you're not. 

And to your point, please provide some evidence of this alleged treason.  Not hearsay.  Actual evidence of treason.   

Definition: In Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, treason is specifically limited to levying war against the US, or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

No I wouldn't - and I can prove it.    Hillary went through the process - and I largely laughed all the way.  Because  (A) Hillary didn't do anything wrong  (B) Hillary didn't hide behind executive privilege  

I didn't cry about Darryl Issa being a hack (even though he was) because at the end of the day they had nothing.    

I'm sorry that you live in denial of the transcript, the cover up, and the first hand testimony of a 50 year West Point grad appointed by George W Bush.     Nixon had defenders like you who wanted to prosecute the prosecuters..   History doesn't judge that tactic to be very effective.   You should prepare yourself for a very sour sandwich..

Let's just start with the transcript.  It most certainly does not include any evidence of treason or any impeachable or criminal offense.  That's not just my opinion but the opinion of constitutional scholar and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz....who claims this kangaroo court is an abuse of the impeachment process. 

You claimed President Trump committed treason.   Please quote exactly in that transcript where President Trump committed the crime of Treason.

We've shown you dozens of times, and you've denied the reality of it every time, so there's no point in showing you yet again.

What a liar.  Show me a 'dozen' times you quoted the transcript to prove President Trump comitted the crime of Treason. I'll bet you $100 you can't do that.  You guys just keep making shit up and I don't know if you really believe it or you just don't care because you hate Trump.

I don't think you know what treason means.

Bill Taylor doesn't agree.  Neither does the president's chief of staff.   And your going to see a whole bunch more people in the room who dont agree with you either as they testify in the oncoming days.   

And lets be honest, Charles, thats ultimately going to matter a heck of a lot more than any petty gripe you have with Adam Schiff.