Bill Taylor Implicated Trump In Today's Testimony

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Bill Taylor doesn't agree.  Neither does the president's chief of staff.   And your going to see a whole bunch more people in the room who dont agree with you either as they testify in the oncoming days.   

 

And lets be honest, Charles, thats ultimately going to matter a heck of a lot more than any petty gripe you have with Adam Schiff.


As I expected...I asked for you to quote something in the transcript or offer some actual proof that President Trump committed the crime of Treason which you have now accused and apparently convicted him of.   What do we get?  Crickets.  PJ is now Captain Kangaroo.

I wasn't in the room.   Bill Taylor was hence my link to his opening statement which does the very thing you

ask.    And This is where you run as fast as you can to "Deep State"

 

Let me know what else I can help with today

Edited on Oct 23, 2019 1:24pm

Hey, Charles: is "Treason" a different crime than plain old "treason"? Because you, just like Trump, Capitalize words you Think are Important. Are you his love-slave to the extent that you want to write like him?

The only parts of his testimony that was leaked were parts that favored the democrats.  Everything else remains a secret.  

 

Secret hearings, in secure rooms where the opposition party is not allowed is far from democratic.


Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

I wasn't in the room.   Bill Taylor was hence my link to his opening statement which does the very thing you

ask.    And This is where you run as fast as you can to "Deep State"

 

Let me know what else I can help with today


Sure.  Did you even read Bill Taylor's opening statement?  You can help me by quoting directly from Bill Taylor's opening statement where he accuses President Trump of treason.  I don't think you know what the crime of treason is.  Republicans who were in the room claim his testimony was discredited upon questioning.  Of course we don't hear any of that from the Kangaroo Court

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Hey, Charles: is "Treason" a different crime than plain old "treason"? Because you, just like Trump, Capitalize words you Think are Important. Are you his love-slave to the extent that you want to write like him?


Hey Asshole.  Same word.  It just provides a little emphasis.  Like you're an Idiot.

Originally posted by: Charles

Hey Asshole.  Same word.  It just provides a little emphasis.  Like you're an Idiot.


In English, capitalization is not used for emphasis. You may not have paid attention in, or even attended, English classes during your eleven years in grade school.

 

That you exhibit the same English language deficiencies as Trump makes me suspect that your love of him extends into actual pathology. Are you planning to dye your face and hair orange and open up a Twitter account?

Originally posted by: tom

The only parts of his testimony that was leaked were parts that favored the democrats.  Everything else remains a secret.  

 

Secret hearings, in secure rooms where the opposition party is not allowed is far from democratic.


And O doofus, if parts of the testimony "remained secret," how do YOU know what they were? Or for that matter, that there were any "secret" parts at all?

 

Inquiries into criminal behavior must remain secret if those making the inquiry and/or alerting the body to misconduct are in danger from doing so. Don't you remember Trump saying that the whistleblower should be killed? Yes, he likely pulled that out of his ass, like everything else he says, but the threat has to be taken seriously nonetheless. So if you don't like the secrecy--your hero caused it!

 

Relax, dum-dum, you'll have access to every detail when the inquiry is over. At that point, you can scream and rave that it's all FAKE NOOZE and a witch hunt blah blah blah.

Prior impeachment proceedings were open. What are the Democrats hiding?

 

Why are the Republicans excluded & can only review the transcripts in the presence of a democrat?

 

Why can’t the Republicans call witnesses?

 

Why are all the leaks in favor of the Democrats?  The Republicans who have reviewed the transcripts have said they tell a different story. 

 

Schif has a history of lying (remember he has all that Russian collusion evidence & he lied about meeting the whistleblower). 

 

 

 

 

Originally posted by: Charles

Sure.  Did you even read Bill Taylor's opening statement?  You can help me by quoting directly from Bill Taylor's opening statement where he accuses President Trump of treason.  I don't think you know what the crime of treason is.  Republicans who were in the room claim his testimony was discredited upon questioning.  Of course we don't hear any of that from the Kangaroo Court


Why, yes!  I did !

 

Its 15 pages of eyewitness testimony implicating the president as someone using our national security interest in exchange for help investigating Trump's opponents.

 

I think this small exchange gets to the heart of the matter....but I encourage all non-hacks on the baord to read the full statement as I provided earlier (the public one not leaked by the Deep State).

 

What else can help with today?

 

------------------------    

"Very concerned I sent Ambassador Sondland a text message asking if 'we are now saying that security assistance and a WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?'  Ambassador Sondland responded asking me to call him, which I did.  During that phone call Ambassador Sondland told me that president Trump had told him that he wants President Zelenskyy to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian influence in the 2016 U.S. election

 

Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized he had a mistake by earlier telling Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting was dependant on such an announcement of investigations.   In fact, Ambassador Sondland said, 'everything' was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance," Taylor testified, adding that Trump wanted Zelensky "in a public box" by making a statement about ordering the investigations.

 

 

 

 

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now