Bolton's Book Manuscript Leaks

WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.

 

Link

 

Of course to the crime loving republicans, this first-hand account of Trump's corruption won't make a difference. Trump could rape their wives and daughters and they would still worship him.

Prove it. Anyone can mouth off...

Originally posted by: David Miller

Prove it. Anyone can mouth off...


Sure, lets put Bolton and Trump under oath and then we can see which one is lying.

This is not really a new revelation, though; everyone--even our Trumpers--knows about Trump's Ukraine extortion scheme. There was already a plethora of evidence incriminating Trump.

 

Does it matter to Republicans, though? No. It should if they loved their country, or at least had a shred of common decency, but no hope of that, apparently.

 

It is to the everlasting shame of Trumpers that they continue to support this man. They react to their shame by attacking and insulting other people (cue a Stalker bleat). That way, they don't have to look inside their own dark, twisted souls.


No,I want YOU to prove your statements, you know just like you did about the collusion fiasco.

What Stalker wants doesn't matter. He forfeited the privilege of being talked to like a rational human being long ago.

 

Mark cited a news source and provided a link. I don't see what he needs to "prove." I also am 100% certain that whatever additional "proof" he might provide, Stalker would just say he's lying, insult him, and scream MAGAMAGAMAGA like a deranged parrot.

First hand testimony is typically considered enough to "prove beyond reasonable doubt" in any court of law.   And proof beyond reasonable doubt is not the bar in an impeachment trial.

 

But I'm sure people like David Miller believe there is in fact reasonable doubt:   The birth-certificate guy could be telling the truth....and his hand picked, far right, Republican Security Advisor is really a far-left tree hugging liberal from San Francisco that was out to get him all along.    Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? 

The ONLY thing I believe is the truth. So far, the DemocRats have shown little of that. Every day they come up with a "new source", which is just as worthless as all of the "sources" they have brought up prior to this new one- and you dummies keep buying into their lies. This type of bullshit will continue up to the general election - and after when President Trump is re-elected. Just like a bad case of herpes, the DemocRats keep coming back with more lies and you idiots keep sucking on that tit. 

Originally posted by: David Miller

The ONLY thing I believe is the truth. So far, the DemocRats have shown little of that. Every day they come up with a "new source", which is just as worthless as all of the "sources" they have brought up prior to this new one- and you dummies keep buying into their lies. This type of bullshit will continue up to the general election - and after when President Trump is re-elected. Just like a bad case of herpes, the DemocRats keep coming back with more lies and you idiots keep sucking on that tit. 


If that's the only thing you believe, then does Trump tell the truth?

Yes or no?

Apparently none of you liberals can stay on topic...

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now