Breaking Sondland Implicates Trump, Rudy And Admits Aid Was Held Up

The entire transcripts of the witnesses and their Q&A with both parties = "selective leaks"..     

 

And none of the content is challenged or said to be wrong.   The Bengazhi-ites are just pissed our Checks-and-Balances are investigating reported crimes against the state.     

 

Just watch the rhetoric from every Republican legislater on TV.   They dont deny or refute the content - they just object to the investigation itself.     

 

They've  drained the swamp and filled it in with a sewer.

You notice, our Trumpers have never come up with anything original. Whatever Fox News has said at any point in the investigation, they've parroted. Now they're obeying their masters and challenging the legitimacy of the investigation--without proof or support for those objections.

 

That's why I loathe them--they don't think for themselves. They just regurgitate whatever propaganda they've swallowed that day.

Innocent until proven guilty. No proof of guilt = no reason to defend. So simple, even a child can understand.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

You notice, our Trumpers have never come up with anything original. Whatever Fox News has said at any point in the investigation, they've parroted. Now they're obeying their masters and challenging the legitimacy of the investigation--without proof or support for those objections.

 

That's why I loathe them--they don't think for themselves. They just regurgitate whatever propaganda they've swallowed that day.


Kevin, I've come up with something very original.  How about every able bodied American pay his own way.  It's quite novel.


Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin, I've come up with something very original.  How about every able bodied American pay his own way.  It's quite novel.


And who pays for those who, able-bodied or not, are unable to produce enough economic output to survive? What about children and the elderly, who can't "pay their own way"? Let 'em all die, because they're unworthy?

Oh, wait.  Kevin’s response to my similar comment from some time ago was that his blind relative should get free shit.  I agreed on Kevin on this stance on free shit for his blind relative.  What we disagree about is that Kevin believes that lazy, abled bodied Americans should get free shit………….because they’re lazy.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Oh, wait.  Kevin’s response to my similar comment from some time ago was that his blind relative should get free shit.  I agreed on Kevin on this stance on free shit for his blind relative.  What we disagree about is that Kevin believes that lazy, abled bodied Americans should get free shit………….because they’re lazy.


No, wrong. I don't really want to talk with some asshole who posts idiotic videos on a forum to attack me. You've forfeited the right to have any conversation with me. However, because you articulate a common stupid and evil Republican talking point, I'll respond.

 

Who are you, or anyone else, to decide that someone is "lazy"? Can you examine someone's life in enough detail to determine that they're not maximizing their economic output? Of course you can't! You're not that wise--or empathic.

 

An "able-bodied" person may not be able to earn enough to support himself/herself for any of a number of reasons, including lack of education, poor intellect, bad work and/or social skills, a psychological or behavioral condition (such as ADHD or autism), the need to care for a child or an older relative...I don't need to complete the list for you. You're not so stupid as to fail to understand what I mean.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now