Of course they did. Pedos and Clown party at it again, What say you groomers here on LVA Sink? Max? Mark? Kevin?
Of course they did. Pedos and Clown party at it again, What say you groomers here on LVA Sink? Max? Mark? Kevin?
I don't follow the CA state legislature or issues, I also don't follow FL or TX, I know MAGA is keenly interested in everything CA does.
On the face of it, I would be in favor of making sex trafficking of minors a felony. I, of course, don't take responsibility for what happens in CA or for the Democrats' actions in CA. I'm a registered independent in the state of CO.
Thanks for the question, I really enjoyed the fact that you threw in the low-info MAGA insult "groomers" in calling me out. It's classic Aaron.
Originally posted by: Inigo Montoya
Of course they did. Pedos and Clown party at it again, What say you groomers here on LVA Sink? Max? Mark? Kevin?
Since what you're "reporting" didn't actually happen, I have no comment except to note that you're a liar and just trying to start an argument.
Like Max I don't really follow legislation in states I don't live in or have connections to.
I spent 3 minutes to discover what Aaron is lying about now. What they were voting on was removing a carve out for 16 &17 year olds not kids.
If Matt Gaetz had paid to fuck his 17 year-old sugar baby in California instead of Florida he would have been charged with a misdemeanor instead of a felony under current California law.
The vote was to change the law so someone that pays a 16 to 17 year old, that lies about their age or has a fake ID, for sex gets the same charge as someone that paid to have sex with a two year old.
The whole issue shows how full of shit MAGAs like Aaron are. He votes for an adjudicated rapist that bragged on a national radio program about barging into dressing rooms where 14 & 15 year old girls were dressing so he could see them naked. I guess anybody that voted for Trump is a pedo and rape enthusiast just like Aaron.
Originally posted by: Mark
Like Max I don't really follow legislation in states I don't live in or have connections to.
I spent 3 minutes to discover what Aaron is lying about now. What they were voting on was removing a carve out for 16 &17 year olds not kids.
If Matt Gaetz had paid to fuck his 17 year-old sugar baby in California instead of Florida he would have been charged with a misdemeanor instead of a felony under current California law.
The vote was to change the law so someone that pays a 16 to 17 year old, that lies about their age or has a fake ID, for sex gets the same charge as someone that paid to have sex with a two year old.
The whole issue shows how full of shit MAGAs like Aaron are. He votes for an adjudicated rapist that bragged on a national radio program about barging into dressing rooms where 14 & 15 year old girls were dressing so he could see them naked. I guess anybody that voted for Trump is a pedo and rape enthusiast just like Aaron.
I see, you think its ok to pay kids for sex. That's disgusting. You should stop going that route, its not a good look or moral.
I do not. I explained to you what the law is in California and what they were actually voting on. It was and is a crime to pay to have sex with 16 & 17 year olds in California already. Given your unwavering support of Matt Gatez, it is clear you think it is ok and that paying a kid for sex qualifies you to serve as Attorney General.
Sincerely, you are the dumbest person I have met in my 20+ years frequenting this forum.
Originally posted by: Inigo Montoya
I see, you think its ok to pay kids for sex. That's disgusting. You should stop going that route, its not a good look or moral.
You support a multiple rapist who has repeatedly bragged about it. Don't bother to try to crawl upward out of the muck to some kind of moral high ground. That's equal parts pathetic and disgusting.
Originally posted by: Inigo Montoya
Of course they did. Pedos and Clown party at it again, What say you groomers here on LVA Sink? Max? Mark? Kevin?
You need to up your troll game, dude. Weak!
Presently, the CA law states that if a 16 or 17 year old is involved, the crime can be either charged as a misdemeanor or felony if sex trafficking is involved.
Originally posted by: Robert Davis
Presently, the CA law states that if a 16 or 17 year old is involved, the crime can be either charged as a misdemeanor or felony if sex trafficking is involved.
But Aaron was having so much fun with his masterbatory conspiracy theories.