Or is it too late? Looks like they picked the biggest loser possible.
But then again:
Obama - I need a VP dumber than me, picks Biden
Biden - I need a VP dumber than me, picks Kamala
Kamala - I need a VP dumber than me, picks Walz
I guess the Democrats are on a full ride to complete the Idiocracy meme.
Last night JD Vance distinguished himself from every politician ever to be on any presidential ticket of either party.. He is the first VP candidate in history that doesnt know the answer to a very simple question: Who won the last election?
Congratulations ! Republicans must be so proud.
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Last night JD Vance distinguished himself from every politician ever to be on any presidential ticket of either party.. He is the first VP candidate in history that doesnt know the answer to a very simple question: Who won the last election?
Congratulations ! Republicans must be so proud.
Don't forget how angry JD got when he was fact checked over the legal Haitin immigrants. It seems not being given carte blanche to tell heinous lies about vulnerable people was a real problem for him.
Since VP debates get relatively low ratings, this debate will be "won" with the discussions and the video clips and even the jokes afterward.
And without a doubt, the two most famous moments will be Vance's inability to name the winner of the last election, and his objection to being fact checked.
Republicans, you happy with that?
Even the LA times, NY Times & Wash Post admit that Vance won
In Walz's in own words "I am a knucklehead" What a leader!
Originally posted by: tom
Even the LA times, NY Times & Wash Post admit that Vance won
In Walz's in own words "I am a knucklehead" What a leader!
That's good to know tom, because if you said it, it probably isn't true.
But for independents, the only audience that matters, they broke 58-42 in Walz favor.
And if you don't have any actual evidence that Politico polls have been biased in the past, I'm sure you'll just make something up.
Apparently mp didn't watch the debate. Mp can look it up. Try RCP they have the article.
The poli was a snap poll of their audience who answered online. It is not scientifically based & considering their audience is liberal it stands to reason that anybody responding to the poll is usually liberal bias
Originally posted by: tom
Apparently mp didn't watch the debate. Mp can look it up. Try RCP they have the article.
The poli was a snap poll of their audience who answered online. It is not scientifically based & considering their audience is liberal it stands to reason that anybody responding to the poll is usually liberal bias
That's stupid Tom-style thinking. Anyone expressing an opinion he disagrees with is biased.
Originally posted by: tom
Apparently mp didn't watch the debate. Mp can look it up. Try RCP they have the article.
The poll was a snap poll of their audience who answered online. It is not scientifically based & considering their audience is liberal it stands to reason that anybody responding to the poll is usually liberal bias
tom, I see what you did there.
Just a few hours earlier, you were criticizing the Politico pollsters, without evidence, of being biased. When asked for evidence of their biased polls in the past, you once again failed to back your play. And now you are pretending to have real knowledge of poll methodology.
You are really bad at this.
