Civility

civility

noun, plural ci·vil·i·ties.

courtesy; politeness.
a polite action or expression: an exchange of civilities.
Archaiccivilization; culture; good breeding.
 
Poor old DonDiego notes that The Management of this website has taken notice of inappropriate behavior among a select few who disrupt the civil exchange of ideas among those who post in the LVA Fora.
 
DonDiego has 3 suggestions for those who may be among the "guilty parties", the application of which is likely to reduce the unpleasantness which has drawn the attention of "The Management":
i. One should not "namecall"; i.e. one should not resort to ad hominem "attacks" upon someone with whom one disagrees.
 
ii. One should not "classify" a poster with whom one disagrees as a member-of-a-group. and then proceed with ad hominen attacks upon the identified group.  e.g, "You are a XXX, and people who are XXX's are despicable wretches who deserve to be destroyed and disposed of."
ii.a. It is also unnecessary to ascribe unnatural behaviors to those with whom one disagrees, unless  the adherance to such behaviors is, in fact, a subject under discussion and  the object of the charge does, in fact, practice unnatural acts. 
 
iii. In summary, stick to the topic at hand; . . . . . present cogent facts and arguments addressing the topic as best one can to influence the opinion of those within the discussion.
 
DonDiego thanks the reader for his attention.
Edited on Sep 13, 2019 5:50pm
Originally posted by: Don

civility

noun, plural ci·vil·i·ties.

courtesy; politeness.
a polite action or expression: an exchange of civilities.
Archaiccivilization; culture; good breeding.
 
Poor old DonDiego notes that The Management of this website has taken notice of inappropriate behavior among a select few who disrupt the civil exchange of ideas among those who post in the LVA Fora.
 
DonDiego has 3 suggestions for those who may be among the "guilty parties", the application of which is likely to reduce the unpleasantness which has drawn the attention of "The Management":
i. One should not "namecall"; i.e. one should not resort to ad hominem "attacks" upon someone with whom one disagrees.
 
ii. One should not "classify" a poster with whom one disagrees as a member-of-a-group. and then proceed with ad hominen attacks upon the identified group.  e.g, "You are a XXX, and people who are XXX's are despicable wretches who deserve to be destroyed and disposed of."
ii.a. It is also unnecessary to ascribe unnatural behaviors to those with whom one disagrees, unless  the adherance to such behaviors is, in fact, a subject under discussion and  the object of the charge does, in fact, practice unnatural acts. 
 
iii. In summary, stick to the topic at hand; . . . . . present cogent facts and arguments addressing the topic as best one can to influence the opinion of those within the discussion.
 
DonDiego thanks the reader for his attention.

I would be much more in agreement with DonDiego had he not been repeatedly guilty of these transgressions himself, albeit in a somewhat gentler fashion than Stalker, Boilerman, and other conservative human bullhorns on this site.

 

Nonetheless, I agree with DonDiego and will refrain from any dialogue with these people. Their horrid views speak for themselves and I don't need to point out how those views are reflective of their character, or lack thereof.

 

I also note that DonDiego in particular, and even Boilerman on occasion, have shown themselves to be willing and capable of rational discussion, not poisoned by their ideology. This, I encourage.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now