That is really funny. Such blatant bias revealed in 2 headlines -- 
That is really funny. Such blatant bias revealed in 2 headlines --
Oh, you mean mxm "news"?
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Oh, you mean mxm "news"?
As shown in my post - the 2 headlines were made by ABC news.
Originally posted by: David Miller
As shown in my post - the 2 headlines were made by ABC news.
Oh, you said "corrupt, biased," so I naturally thought you were referring to mxm.
Immediately before the VP debate, ABC tells us this debate is incredibly important. After the Democrat gets thumped, ABC tells us that these VP debates are unimportant. Kevin can't grasp the hypocrisy, yet he's a good speller. Do employers most want good spellers or critical thinkers? This explains why Kevin had to work for the government.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Immediately before the VP debate, ABC tells us this debate is incredibly important. After the Democrat gets thumped, ABC tells us that these VP debates are unimportant. Kevin can't grasp the hypocrisy, yet he's a good speller. Do employers most want good spellers or critical thinkers? This explains why Kevin had to work for the government.
Are you high? I've never worked for the federal or any state or city government.
Oh, and as far as what you call "hypocrisy" goes...when Walz kicked Vance's ass, Fox Nooze "reported" it as "a crushing victory"...for Vance 😄😄😄😄
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Are you high? I've never worked for the federal or any state or city government.
For years Kevin said he was a teacher. Is he now denying he was a teacher?
Originally posted by: tom
For years Kevin said he was a teacher. Is he now denying he was a teacher?
Teachers in Oregon are not employed by the government. They are employed by the school districts where they work. School districts are not government agencies. They are autonomous and do not govern the communities where they are located.
Stupid Tom.
I understand that you're stretching the definition of "government agency" just to make a stupid point. There is indeed government oversight, but that's not the same thing. What you're saying is as if someone working for a utility company was really working for the government because there is a state utility regulation compliance board. Or for that matter, if someone working for Bank of America was really working for the government because of the existence of the Fed.
Easy distinction to grasp--well, maybe not with YOUR brain.
Teachers are paid thru taxes that are administered by the school district whose members are elected or selected by the government. In NY teachers are covered by the Taylor Law which forbids strikes by govt employees. Their pension and benefits are run by the state.
Teachers are government employees.
kevin is stupid
Who paid your salary as a school teacher...or did you suddenly decide that you weren't a teacher? I recall when you told us that you studied accounting in college after telling us that a corporations revenue = how much a company is "making". No economics 101 student would ever make such a comment.
