CNN’s Burnett admits that evidence of Chinese funneling money to Biden family ‘doesn’t look good’

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Because the Clintons are 80 years old and retired?      And since the Clintons dont profit even one penny from their charity it begs the question as to what bullshit dots you are ewven trying to connect..    You have even less evidence of pay-for-play in that instance  than with Joe Biden.   I'd ask you yo show your work - but we alredy know what a joke that results in.   

 

And since you desperately tried to change the topic to charities....this is where you get to defend all the scumbaggery that forced the Trump charity to shut down.  Go ahead.   I left lots of space below.        


Your argument is that Hilllary and Bill, who turned two years older, watched donations drop by 98% was because of their age?  How do you say this with a straight face?  Next, I'm sure that PJ will tell us that it had nothing to do with neither Clinton being able to sell favors.  You're shameless.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Your argument is that Hilllary and Bill, who turned two years older, watched donations drop by 98% was because of their age?  How do you say this with a straight face?  Next, I'm sure that PJ will tell us that it had nothing to do with neither Clinton being able to sell favors.  You're shameless.


You have no evidence of the Clintons "selling favors," so that's nothing more than Boilerbabble.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Your argument is that Hilllary and Bill, who turned two years older, watched donations drop by 98% was because of their age?  How do you say this with a straight face?  Next, I'm sure that PJ will tell us that it had nothing to do with neither Clinton being able to sell favors.  You're shameless.


Yes I do!  And since they dont make a single  penny  off their charity and you cant say what anyone got in return for their donations then you are 0 for 2 !    You cant show one thing on either side oif that equation.   And thats pretty pathetic, dont ya think?   

 

 And I cant even begin to fathom how someone can fault donations to an organization that does nothing but cure AIDS in Afrtica, provide drinking water in Haiti, and educate impoverished girls in SE Asia.    You are way out of your league trying to find fault with the CLinton FOundation.   You could live to be a million years old and not make even a fraction of the positive impact the Clinton FOundation has.   Its pretty hilarious.

 

Now, are you going to keep running away from all the scumbaggery of the Trump charity that was legally forced to close?  And all the scumaggey special interest money dumped into his personal pockets through his hotels and golf clubs?  All the taxpayer money he personally funnelled into his own pocket by spending at his own businesses?   Of course, you will Boilerman.   Because you dont care when scumbag Republicans line their pockets with dark money - you just get upset about fictional scenarios involving Democrats that you cant find any evidence for.

 

 

Go Farleigh-Dickenson !

 

 

 

 

Did you notice how I said this and Boilerman went MIA ?  

 

"And since you desperately tried to change the topic to charities....this is where you get to defend all the scumbaggery that forced the Trump charity to shut down.  Go ahead.   I left lots of space below.  "


Boiler wallows in shame. He supports crooks and thieves and attacks people who do good.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

I disagree. Blanket statements are almost never accurate. There are plenty of politicians with integrity and honesty. Because the person who held the highest office in the land was a crook, con man, and liar, and surrounded himself with lackeys, sycophants, and grifters, we think that everybody's like him nowadays. Nothing could be further from the truth.

 

There's nothing wrong with being a politician. Somewhere along the line it became a dirty word. But a person who isn't a politician can't be an effective representative, legislator, or governor.

 

Are politicians self-serving? Yes. But so are doctors, plumbers, manicurists, chimney sweeps, and pizza chefs. The real question is, do they do their jobs? Are they truly responsive to their constituents' needs and wishes? One negative example would be DeSantis. He doesn't govern--he performs stunts. Nothing he's done even slightly benefits his constituents.


Blanket statement in this case is about 98% accurate though.  It would be like calling teachers lazy.  2% aren't but 98% are.  Similar to politicians being crooked.  

Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33

Blanket statement in this case is about 98% accurate though.  It would be like calling teachers lazy.  2% aren't but 98% are.  Similar to politicians being crooked.  


Uh huh. I doubt that you really even mean that, but if you do, it's a profoundly ignorant statement.

No shame here......other than maybe for the Boilers.  Anyone who says that Clinton Foundation funds dropping 98% was for anything else than their sudden inability to sell favors is a liar or an idiot.  They flew the world in jets paid for by the Foundation.  They stayed at the nicest places on earth and ate at the best restaurants....all paid by the Foundation.  They creatively mixed criminal business with pleasure.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

No shame here......other than maybe for the Boilers.  Anyone who says that Clinton Foundation funds dropping 98% was for anything else than their sudden inability to sell favors is a liar or an idiot.  They flew the world in jets paid for by the Foundation.  They stayed at the nicest places on earth and ate at the best restaurants....all paid by the Foundation.  They creatively mixed criminal business with pleasure.


Boilerbabble.

 

Hilarious that flying in jets is "criminal" when the Clintons do it. Meanwhile, Trump stealing tens of millions from the government is perfectly OK.

The Clintons paid for private flights with payments paid in return for federal government favors.  Trump did not steal anything.  I provided information on the only person that a randomly chose to research who was addressed within PJ's supposed pay for play article.  She paid Trump to join Mara-a-Lago in 2010, for god's sake.  That's all the better that you guys can put up?

Edited on Mar 27, 2023 12:59pm
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now