Collusion

As expected, the truth has cone out. More of this to come...https://www.facebook.com/TuckerCarlsonTonight/videos/609137189812303/

Tucker Carlson. Strike one.

Facebook. Strike two.

Stalker. Strike three!

Let's look at their specific quotes from 2017.  The release of this information was approved in 2018, but was not made available by Schiff until a week ago, after substantial legal pressure was brought to bear.

They lied and lied and lied when not under oath.  How many times were we told about iron clad evidence?  Thousands of times, I suspect, and each time they were lying.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/intel-transcripts-obama-officials-no-empirical-evidence-trump-russia-collusion

Here is the article with the documented quotes.  The quotes that you will not find when watching and reading agenda driven left wing media.

The transcripts, which were released by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., revealed top Obama officials were questioned over whether they had or had seen evidence of such collusion, coordination or conspiracy -- the issue that drove the FBI's initial case and later the special counsel probe.

“I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election,” former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified in 2017. “That’s not to say that there weren’t concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.”

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, according to the transcript of her interview, was asked about the same issue. Power replied: “I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn’t read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community.”

When asked again, she said:  “I am not.”

Video

Obama National Security Adviser Susan Rice was asked the same question.

“To the best of my recollection, there wasn’t anything smoking, but there were some things that gave me pause,” she said, according to her transcribed interview, in response to whether she had any evidence of conspiracy. “I don’t recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect that I saw…conspiracy prior to my departure.”

When asked whether she had any evidence of “coordination,” Rice replied: “I don’t recall any intelligence or evidence to that effect.”

When asked about collusion, Rice replied: “Same answer.”

Former Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes was asked the same question during his House Intelligence interview.

“I wouldn’t have received any information on any criminal or counterintelligence investigations into what the Trump campaign was doing, so I would not have seen that information,” Rhodes said.

When pressed again, he said: “I saw indications of potential coordination, but I did not see, you know, the specific evidence of the actions of the Trump campaign.”

OBAMA KNEW DETAILS OF WIRETAPPED FLYNN CALL

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch also said that she did "not recall that being briefed up to me."

"I can't say that it existed or not," Lynch said, referring to evidence of collusion, conspiracy or coordination.

Meanwhile, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was not asked that specific question but rather questions about the accuracy and legitimacy of the unverified anti-Trump dossier compiled by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele.

Video

McCabe was asked during his interview in 2017 what was the most “damning or important piece of evidence in the dossier that” he “now knows is true.”

McCabe replied: “We have not been able to prove the accuracy of all the information.”

“You don’t know if it’s true or not?” a House investigator asked, to which McCabe replied: “That’s correct.”

Schiff released the files -- approved in late 2018 for release by the committee -- after facing pressure earlier this week from Republicans to do so. Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell then notified Schiff that the redaction and declassification process was complete, and that the records were ready to be made public."

Uh - this is a big fat "so what"?

Thats right - the Obama administration had no knowledge of any direct relationships between the Trump campaign and Russia.   Thats because the investigation into that did not occur until Obama left office.   Hello?   This is FOX News' big gotcha revelation?

After Republican President Trump took office - The Republican Congress initiated a Republican special counsel led by Republican Robert Mueller who found that Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, Roger Stone, and Donald Trump jr all had meetings/relationships/communications with Russians and wikileaks on the specific topic of campaign help.....and then lied about it.    And that was after the president fired Republican James Comey for looking into the same topic.

The conclusion of that investigation is a matter of record and resulted in several of Trump's inner circle scumbags going to prison while the president himself hid from the investigators under executive privilige.

What else can I help with today?

 Yet they had evidence to surveil the trump administration

The FBI did...yes.    And that’s not a secret.         Trump publicly called for Russian help and then got it that same week.    roger Stone went on national television stating there would be A big revelation on Hillary’s emails right before Wikileaks dumped that information.    

Thats not enough evidence for you?

Trump prompted the FBI investigation by openly inviting Russia to interfere in the election. He also met with various Russian stooges, and so did members of his campaign team.

It would have been remiss of the FBI to NOT investigate him. (I can only imagine the shitstorm of righteous anger from Republicans if Hillary had done anything even closely resembling what Trump did.)

Trump committed treason. Period.

All of those people quoted above publicly said there was collusion, but under oath they said there wasn't.  So they lied. 

How many times did shiftless declare he has seen the evidence & will make it public. To date he has shown nothing. 

The fbi case was based on FISA warrants from the Steele Dossier, which was discredited a long time ago. All the "errors" in the warrants were in favor of the fbi. 

The fbi admitted privately that they were going after General Flynn & actually had no case. 

They settled on the Logan Act which had not been used in 240 years. 

Reasonable people would conclude that this was an attempted coup by the national police force. 

Tom - your  "reasonable people" statement leaves eliminates Kevin and PJ from this discussion.

A big so what? Are you frickin kidding? POS Obama knew everything they were doing and backing the lie’s, even having illegal wiretaps! This should concern any American the depths that the deep state will pull to try to regain power.

I mentioned months ago that Obama’s cronies days in court are coming! Well it is starting to unravel before your eyes!

”what else can I help you with today” really you are much to arrogant about the innocence of your party!

get a clue PJ