No, they created a Republic to specifically perserve slavery. The electoral college needs to go at the very least. There is no reason to carry on with a racist system.
Edited on Oct 25, 2022 10:39am
No, they created a Republic to specifically perserve slavery. The electoral college needs to go at the very least. There is no reason to carry on with a racist system.
Originally posted by: Charles
Let me get this right. Kevin and Toad are calling David Miller a coward because he won't agree to leave if his election predication is wrong while they risk nothing if he's right?
Have we even seen an election prediction from Keviepoo and Toady? Of course we haven't. Why? We can only speculate that they are the limp-dick little cowards. They are the ball-less chickenshit propaganda-spewing groomer liars.
You guys are so tough...so strong....but can't even make a fucking prediction of your own to contrast David Miller. Why is that? Kevin claims "I'm not making any predictions. I'm not claiming that any one outcome will or won't happen. I'm not so stupid as to ringingly foretell the future". That's because he is the real chickenshit little coward. He should at least have the courage to tell us which party he thinks will win the House and Senate. But of course the slimy little jerk doesn't dare. He and Pedo Pete are quite a pair.
Oh...and for the record, I predict Republicans will win the house by at least 20 seats and Democrats will not be the majority in the Senate.
Let's see how they try to weasel out of this one! Step up to the plate assholes or step out of the park.
Yo, Chucky: I'm not stupid enough to try to predict the results of the election. Davey Dog is. Maybe you are, too?
I'll bet you never used the idiot word "groomer" before Fox News fed it to you. Now you're obsessed with it--you shove it into every post. Sicko.
I've already said multiple times that I believe the most likely outcome is that the House flips but the Senate doesn't. But I'm not predicting anything, any more than I'm predicting the result of the World Series. And as far as "contrasting" dumb fuck asshole David Miller--why do I need to? I didn't say he was "wrong" or "right" (obviously, he can't be either at this point). His and your prediction may indeed come true, and you'll wet your panties in joy. But to say that WILL happen is the act of a fucking fool.
And you and David are fucking fools and yes, cowards.
Originally posted by: Charles
Actually you may be right. Now would that be the 'popular vote margin' as reported by 538? It looks to me like Republicans have a 3.9% edge there too, but I just don't see it as Democrats get 80+% in some big cities..
2022 House Forecast | FiveThirtyEight
Good thing our founding fathers created a Republic that recognized the diversity of the many states/congressional districts and not mob rule where LA, NY City, Chicago and a handful of population centers control the 50 states.
Good God, you're stupid, Charles, in addition to being a scumbag fascist asshole. Why SHOULDN'T the voters in cities, in the aggregate, carry more weight than the voters in rural areas? There are far more of them! That's democracy! 1,000,000 people have more electoral power than 1,000! Chicago voters have more influence on the outcome than Chicken Flats, Nebraska voters! DUHHHHHHH!
How in sweet holy motherfuck is that "mob rule"? The people who don't vote the way you do are a "mob," is that it?
You probably ARE ignorant enough to not know that the present system was crafted to give slave states and rural areas disproportionate power, in order to get those states to join up. They knew that in an ACTUAL democracy, slavery would get kicked out the door in short order.
Those same unfair and antidemocratic "adjustments" are being used to pass abortion bans and various incarnations of the "Niggers Can't Vote Act." You must be so proud!
Originally posted by: Mark
No, they created a Republic to specifically perserve slavery. The electoral college needs to go at the very least. There is no reason to carry on with a racist system.
Yup..there would have been no Constitution ( or it would have been significantly delayed) without the preservation of / concessions for slavery at that time. Presently, that will require a constitutional amendment ( to dispose of the electoral college)..with a two-thirds vote necessary from both houses of Congress. Or a Convention of States referendum with a three-fourths vote from state legislatures. Both scenarios would be tough if not impossible to accomplish presently. The process might be similar to cessation of the insult war between Kevin and David here; but of course that's their business.
Originally posted by: Charles Higgins
Yup..there would have been no Constitution ( or it would have been significantly delayed) without the preservation of / concessions for slavery at that time. Presently, that will require a constitutional amendment ( to dispose of the electoral college)..with a two-thirds vote necessary from both houses of Congress. Or a Convention of States referendum with a three-fourths vote from state legislatures. Both scenarios would be tough if not impossible to accomplish presently. The process might be similar to cessation of the insult war between Kevin and David here; but of course that's their business.
No, that's much more likely to happen--because David could die any day, when he calls someone a liar who has a gun and is in a bad mood.
What we've learned is that we never should have included the slave/red states.
Kevin, could you at least wager...something? Maybe a paragraph praising some right winger here. Have you ever heard the phrase "skin in the game?"
There's a decent chance that the Republicans will win both houses. Biden is almost exactly unpopular as Trump was in 2018 and almost exactly as unpopular as Obama was in 2010, and they both had bad midterm election results.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
Kevin, could you at least wager...something? Maybe a paragraph praising some right winger here. Have you ever heard the phrase "skin in the game?"
There's a decent chance that the Republicans will win both houses. Biden is almost exactly unpopular as Trump was in 2018 and almost exactly as unpopular as Obama was in 2010, and they both had bad midterm election results.
To back up the prediction that I'm absolutely not making, because unlike Davey Dog, I'm not so stupid as to do that?
As I've said, I consider all three scenarios to be possible: both houses flip, the RepubliQ win the House but not the Senate, and the Democrats hang on to both. The one scenario I consider highly improbable is that the RepubliQ grab the Senate but not the House.
So how could I plausibly wager something when I think any one of three things could happen?
I agree that the incumbent party almost always does poorly in the midterms, which is why I consider a complete flip a possibility. For what it's worth, I would have predicted (gasp!) such an outcome, but then three things happened: 1) the anti-abortion crusade, 2) there's a slowing of inflation/gas prices, and 3) the RepubliQ nominated a complete basket of deplorables/wackadoodles. So now I think a complete flip and a House flip to be equally likely. Many political anal-ists agree with me.
So why would I predict anything or bet on my prediction?
Tell ya what, though. If Davey Dog's prediction turns out to be accurate, I'll write a paragraph praising Davey's favorite serial killer. (Alternatively, serial rapist, like his orange god.) OK?
