David Miller Has Disappeared...

...since Trump's criminal misconduct has become indisputable.  Has he been institutionalized? 

I strongly suspect that he has been in an institution for quite some time already.

He really, really hasn't liked being called out for his lies, his support of a traitor, and his bigoted views. He also may be dimly realizing that he says Trump can do this and this and that (above the law) but attacked Obama for doing far less--making him a partisan hypocrite.

There's also the possibility that he's not a person at all, but rather, a Russian chat-bot or something of that nature. He certainly doesn't talk like a human.

I think we're not yet so lucky as to be rid of him permanently. Maybe he's driving to a Trump hate rally. (God, do those people get themselves off at those events--ten thousand people orgasming every time Trump lies.) Also, he made a sacred pledge to insult me every time I posted here, and he wouldn't want to violate that, honorable man that he is and all :)

Trump's participation in Russian collusion was also indisputable.

I've said it here before, but it bears repeating now.  When you discuss politics with people who are partisan, it is like wrestling with a pig.  You have to get down in the mud, and the pig likes it!  You guys insult people and then have the audacity to wonder why they want nothing to do with you.  Who would?  Russia!  No proof.  Collusion!  No proof.  Obstruction!  No proof.  Mueller!  No proof.  Ukraine! No proof.  Impeachment!  No proof.  And yet you keep on pretending that you have proof of something.  If you had proof, President Trump would have been impeached already.

Maybe when Mark and Stuck on Stupid find something that they can actually prove, there can be conversation.  But to listen to your yaking on constantly, when you have zero proof, reasonable people will just learn to stay out of the mud.  Congratulations!  You have educated us to stay out of the mud.

Just remember, if you can't prove your idiotic rhetoric, there will be an election in just about a year.  And your candidates look like the loser line at a Harrah's ATM.  Now the three or four of you can prattle on amongst yourselves.  Carry on comrades!

I'm glad we have non-partisan people like Fritz to wade through the rhetoric.

Eyewitness tetimony from people taking direct orders from President Trump does not constitute proof...nor does the transcript of the call Trump made shaking own a foreign government for help...nor does the administrations deliberate attempt to hide that transcript on a narrow access server.   Good to know !

Dony Treason was right - he can shoot someone in broad daylight on  5th avenue and his base would defend him.    Fritz is proof.     

For the record, I'm not interested in converting the  Bengazhi and Monica Lewinski cheerleaders into pursuing justice in a real scandal that has real consequences for our national secuity .  Part of living in a free democracy is tolerating people like these guys (which doesn't mean you cant label them as the inbred retards that they are)

Lvfritz persists in his peculiar misconception that we here in this forum are the ones conducting the impeachment investigation. Yes, "I" don't have any proof. Those actually conducting the investigation, though, do. And I assure fritz that Mueller, the Ukraine, etc. do in fact exist.

He also stubbornly insists that the investigation is a criminal trial. We've tried repeatedly to explain to this utter moron that it isn't. There isn't a defendant. There isn't a judge or a jury. And the investigation is BIPARTISAN. Idiot!

Do I think Trumper scum can be educated? Reformed? Taught to be decent human beings? Hell, no. Lvfritz proves the futility of any such effort, time and time again--as does David Miller. We're just wondering where Miller went, much as we wonder what happened to the dog that shits on our lawn every morning.

We're going to have to live with these idiot Trumper scum, as Mark says, but that doesn't mean we can't marginalize them, exclude them, stigmatize them, ignore them, and cover them with scorn and ridicule. The way ordinary French citizens treated their Nazi collaborator friends and neighbors in 1944.

It is not bipartisan when the Republicans are not treated as equals. They can't subpoena or call witnesses.  President Trump's lawyer cannot be in attendance.   

The Republicans cannot view the transcripts without a Democrat minder to watch.  They cannot take notes of the transcripts  Even though the hearings are secret, only the democrats can leak info & only info that supports their case. 

Tom, are you incapable of understanding the difference between a trial and an investigation?

When you get a traffic ticket for speeding is the guy that pulls you over wearing a robe and carrying a gavel instead of a gun?  Does he come up to your window and ask if you would like to call any witnesses in your defense.  If someone steals your stuff do you call the courthouse or the police department? 

Even Trey "Benghazi" Gowdy said today that public hearings are nothing more than a circus. 

Since the democrats feel the need for secrecy, why do they keep leaking selected versions of the testimony that favors them?

They don't. Some of the witnesses are releasing their opening remarks and/or their attorneys are summarizing the highlights of their testimony.  That has nothing to do with the Democrats. If you are talking about leaks, the reason there are no Republican leaks is that there is nothing good for Trump to leak. That is why Republicans have switched from he didn't do it to he did it but we don't think it is a fair process. They know exactly what was said in those hearings.  If they didn't, they would still be claiming no quid pro quo.