Rigging the result - United States Attorney William M. McSwain announced on Thursday that Domenick J. DeMuro, a Judge of Elections in Philadelphia, has been charged with and pleaded guilty to stuffing ballot boxes over the course of several years with fraudulent votes for Democrat candidates in federal, state, and local elections.
I got a question for you David.
If hypothetically a Republican was arrested for harvesting ballots and then trashing ones that did not favor a Republican congressional candidate, would someone be justified in claiming that it was the "Republican Process?"
Looking forward to your answer!
The key word is "hypothetically" - which has nothing to do with this posting. If and when it happens, post it. Until then try to stay on topic.
Originally posted by: David Miller
The key word is "hypothetically" - which has nothing to do with this posting. If and when it happens, post it. Until then try to stay on topic.
Leading with your chin again I see.
The charges relate to the tainted 9th congressional district election last year in which Republican Mark Harris led in the unofficial vote tally by a margin of about 900 votes over Democrat Dan McCready. But the election results were overturned by the state after an investigation into an absentee ballot operation on Harris' behalf suggested that Dowless had improperly collected and possibly tampered with ballots.
Source
The recount showed the DemocRatic attempt at stealing the election, utilizing a corrupt judge who had been doing this for YEARS. If that is "leading with your chin", then so be it.
Sorry, Stalker, your faux outrage doesn't wash, given that you have been perfectly OK with dozens of instances of Republican election fraud over the last few years.
That's one problem with being a loyal Republican and crawling to Trump on your hands and knees to beg to be allowed to suck his dick. It makes all of your manufactured outrage hypocritical and destroys whatever credibility you may have had.
Originally posted by: David Miller
The key word is "hypothetically" - which has nothing to do with this posting. If and when it happens, post it. Until then try to stay on topic.
As you know, I posted it. With a source.
So I'll repeat my question with one slight modification:
If ̶h̶y̶p̶o̶t̶h̶e̶t̶i̶c̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ a Republican was arrested for harvesting ballots and then trashing ones that did not favor a Republican congressional candidate, would someone be justified in claiming that it was the "Republican Process?"
Looking forward to your answer!
You have my answer.
The fact is, that Mister and Kevin don't care if it's true. That's what is very sad.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
The fact is, that Mister and Kevin don't care if it's true. That's what is very sad.
I'll assume you are just trolling here. Because as you know, I believe that when anyone pleads guilty and stipulates to their crimes UNDER OATH they are very, very, very guilty. Obviously.
But I'll ask you the same question I asked David:
If ̶h̶y̶p̶o̶t̶h̶e̶t̶i̶c̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ a Republican was arrested for harvesting ballots and then trashing ones that did not favor a Republican congressional candidate, would someone be justified in claiming that it was the "Republican Process?"
Looking forward to your answer! (Even though I don't think you're man enough to answer it directly. I hope to be proven wrong.)
