Originally posted by: Aaron
Personally I think the whole tenured thing is BS, though it started with good intentions. And I might be convinced on term limits for SCOTUS with a good argument.
And yes, if you make a contract or an agreement, no matter how dumb it might be later, you should make good on it. If these professors are being kicked out because of their views, no matter how radical or crazy, you get what you bought, don't make the same mistake on the next one. I don't care how someone swings politically or sexually, it's part of our culture and diversity and what makes us Americans. You do you, just stay away from the kids.
They aren't being kicked out for being radical or crazy. They're being kicked out for NOT being radical or crazy, as in, not being MAGA. One professor was videoed criticizing Trump during a lecture. The video was forwarded to the "woke" board, which promptly killed his tenure. He was pressured to retire.
And I don't think it was a "mistake" to hire profs who didn't pass the MAGA purity test. After all, as you say, universities are supposed to be places of diverse thought, not ideological pressure cookers. Any university that insists on its profs being MAGAs isn't a university at all. (As would be the case if it insisted that they were all liberals.)
You might remark, well, 90% of college profs are liberals anyway. I'd say, that's their choice, the choice of those who employ them, and the choice of those who pay to attend their classes. It's a simple, proven fact that the smarter a person is, the more likely they are to be liberal. Universities are full of smart people. Q.E.D.
Just to remark on SCOTUS term limits--the FFs created lifetime SCOTUS appointments because they never DREAMED of any justices hanging around for three or four decades after they were appointed. It was supposed to be the ultimate reward for a long and storied career--something for the judge to bask in glory for the last few years of his life. The law was enacted back when average life expectancy was around 40. Now, it's 78. It's actually like when the Second Amendment was written--very carefully and specifically--, the FFs never imagined one human being being able to shoot and kill a hundred other human beings in ten seconds. So referring to the Second Amendment when discussing gun control is stupid--that Amendment, like the SCOTUS foundation, is grossly obsolete.