Divergent views of point cause Snowflake teachers to experience "clinical anxiety"

Tom, that's just perfect. Thank you.

Your clip is from an OPINION piece in the Wapo, which you apparently equate with the "news" article from Fox. Which just shows that even you recognize that Fox produces opinion under the guise of being news.

Thank you for being useful. (I bet you haven't heard that phrase in a while!)

the Killer Kid wasn't defending his own property (in fact, he wasn't defending anything--he was there to kill people).

Lam's brain is as thick as granite.  He was defending himself from the felon who grabbed his gun, the felon who tried to kill him with a skateboard & the third felon who tried to shoot him with an illegal weapon.

Mp you said a media source such as the Wash Post wouldn't post incorrect information.  I posted an article from them with the incorrect info that his gun was illegally purchased & as a typical liberal you say that story doesn't count

Nope didn't say that. This is a Vegas forum, so how about a bet? If you're right, I'll leave the forum. If you're wrong, you leave.

I already posted the article & you say it doesn't count, so there is point to the bet

Tommie-poo, you're lying. Typical conservative. MP never said that the article "doesn't count." Be a man for once and admit when you're full of conservative shit (which is most of the time).

You have this idiotic habit of "quoting" other people with things they never said, then attacking them. Like when I just said that your hero, the Killer Kid, wasn't defending his property, and you said, he was defending himself from felons (as if private citizens have an automatic right to kill people who are felons). I said that the right to defend your own property with lethal force doesn't apply if...wait for it...your'e nowhere near your own property. I mean, DUHHHHH, Tommie-poo, you thickheaded Trumper clown!

No one should bother to talk to or otherwise engage with you. You have your own particular rancid, idiotic belief set, and no one can change your feeble conservative mind or improve your reasoning skills. But when you lie about what someone says and then use that lie as a pretext to attack them, I'll call you out on it. Every time.

Here's your statement: "you said a media source such as the Wash Post wouldn't post incorrect information." Either show me where I said that (and I go away forever) or you go away forever. Whichever one of us is lying, it will be no loss, right?

Tommie-poo doesn't have the balls to admit that he lied about what you said, so don't expect him to take your bet.