Originally posted by: David Miller
According to Kevin-"I can discuss any subject I want, on any thread I choose, and don't need Stalker's permission to do so, scream as he might." ---- There you have it. A true narcissist -Narcissistic personality disorder — one of several types of personality disorders — is a mental condition in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for excessive attention and admiration.
Trump!
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Tom, that is my point of my original post. During the first month after Kavanaugh was accused, Ford's name was mentioned 1,898 times by CNN, and MSNBC mentioned her name 1,878 times. In contrast, in the first month after the after Biden was accused, Read's name was mentions 15 times on CNN, and 10 times on MSNBC". Our resident Liberals tells us that we Conservatives only imagine how the agenda driven liberal media covers this stuff. Liberals should feel silly for following media with such an abvious bias.
Kevin confirms that Kavanaugh's coverage was more extensive because he was nominated for a very important job.
Good morning Boilerman!
I'm still saying that your statistics above are make-believe, but who knows, I could be wrong (rarely). Did you make them up? Do you have a source? Please post it soon, okey-doke? (third request)
For those to lazy to research, (this took less than5 minutes)
The GDELT Project & Internet Project which tracks mentions on tv has the numbers.
All the names of people who have confirmed discussing the Biden accusation 23 years ago. Here you go, Mister.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/then-and-now-how-evidence-in-kavanaugh-case-compares-with-biden-accusation
Mister, here is a link addressing the disparity of coverage between Kavanaugh and Biden. It's easy enough to find if one cares to find the truth.
Any objective person already knew of the disparity. The Kevin's and Mister's of the world need the raw data. Here you go.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/04/29/biden_vs_kavanaugh_how_the_metoo_numbers_stack_up_143065.html
Labeling an opinion piece that aligns with your own views "the truth" does not make it true or anything else other than an opinion.
You Cons love to do that stupid shit. You scrape something off the floor of the internet and post it here with the expectation of---what? That we'll all be converted?
You don't need to convince your fellow Trumpers of anything---their minds are already set in concrete. And decent people are very unlikely to embrace Trumper memes.
So why even bother?
Originally posted by: Boilerman
All the names of people who have confirmed discussing the Biden accusation 23 years ago. Here you go, Mister.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/then-and-now-how-evidence-in-kavanaugh-case-compares-with-biden-accusation
None of them say they witnessed Reade complain about sexual assault contemporaneously. Except maybe her brother, who, of course, changed his story.
I guess that runs in the family.
We need to get to the bottom of this. Maybe Geraldo can coordiante a live lie detector test on FOX for poor Tara. If it's true, it's sad that the Democrats would treat a sexually assaulted woman like this. If it's false, then she's probably suffereing from some mental illness and it's sad that the Democrats would treat a mentally ill person like this.
Where's Gloria Steinem when you need her?
Originally posted by: Charles
If it's false, then she's probably suffereing from some mental illness and it's sad that the Democrats would treat a mentally ill person like this.
So exactly how should someone treat "a mentally ill person" who is accusing someone of committing a crime? Inquiring minds want to know!
Sleepy Joe said that we must believe the woman. If we must, we must.
