Don, I was using the dictionary definition of Treason, not the one found in the U.S. code which only specifies which types of treasonous acts are prosecutable under the U.S. Code. Individual states also define which types of treasonous acts violate their state-specific treason laws. The U.S. Constitution defines bribery and treason as high crimes. In fact, they are the only two acts listed as specific examples of high crimes. From what we know at this point, it looks like Trump committed both of these.
— U.S. Constitution, Article II, section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
As President, Trump would be prosecuted under the Impeachment rules found in the Constitution, not the U.S. code.
Dictionary Definition Of Treason - The crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
Did Trump betray the U.S. government? Of course, he did. Was it an attempt to overthrow the government by rigging the election. Of course, it was.
I have learned trying to explain something away by citing a highly technical definition is a tactic Don uses when faced with an uncomfortable truth. Nevertheless, I’ll let Don play law student. What is your opinion on the legality of bribing foreign governments with taxpayer funds to have them criminally investigate your political opponents? And what is the legality of converting U.S. funds to personal use for the purpose of bribing foreign governments?
His acts may not meet the definition of treason under the U.S. code but these treasonous acts are certainly high crimes under the U.S. Constitution.
BTW: The guy that wrote the book on Constitutional Law that almost every law student in the country is taught from agrees with me. See